On Sunday 20 July 2003 11:54 pm, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Simon wrote:
> > > PS: Would you mind leaving proprietary file formats of the list?
> >
> > Well, if you had opened the file
>
> Which I can't as I have no use for windows here.
which is no reason to not be able to o
Simon,
Thank you for your interest in wanting to help out on the support list.
Although .doc may not be the best chioce for the attachments, it isn't a big
deal to me. :-) The users have a couple of options here, one is to locate
the folder where sword.exe resides and delete options.conf, layout.co
Yes, that's how I have to do it, as well. It is just a bit unwieldy
and requires me to run X11 since it hasn't been built for the MacOS
window management system yet. That also creates some inherent
cut/paste problems, and won't allow me to double-click .doc files.
Thanks. I was hoping I had
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Darin Duphorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am a Mac OS X user, and yes Word is available on Mac, but I don't
> have it, and can't justify the . I am interested in how you are
> reading .doc files on Mac OS X if you can't afford MS Office.
I'm not an Mac OS X user but
I am a Mac OS X user, and yes Word is available on Mac, but I don't
have it, and can't justify the . I am interested in how you are
reading .doc files on Mac OS X if you can't afford MS Office.
On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 06:23 PM, Christian Renz wrote:
Which I can't as I have no use for
Which I can't as I have no use for windows here.
Not to be a nitpicker, but doc file format != Windows. I can read .doc
files just fine on Mac OS X here, although I currently don't use
Windows and I can't afford MS Office.
Apart from the technical issues, it is also a matter of attitude. I
agree th
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Simon wrote:
> > PS: Would you mind leaving proprietary file formats of the list?
>
> Well, if you had opened the file
Which I can't as I have no use for windows here.
The remainder is about issues which do not belong on this list at all!
Hugo.
--
All email sent to me i
> PS: Would you mind leaving proprietary file formats of the list?
Well, if you had opened the file, you would have seen that it contains 2
screenshots, which can maybe help the developers here to trace the bug. So,
no discussion please about 'proprietary file formats' and nonsense like
that, it's
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Simon wrote:
> There 2 users in de support mailing list that get access violations AFTER
> they've installed Sword...
>
> Any idea what can be advised to fix it?
They can not get access to what?
Hugo.
PS: Would you mind leaving proprietary file formats of the list?
--
A
