Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-09 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 12:03 -0700, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > Again, I don't care much about the rendering, but I'm mostly > concerned > with a regression of losing distinction.  I simply deferred the > rendering choice to the print publisher of the only SWORD module I > know > which contains a ten

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-08 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
ctly in the filter, but >>> instead CSS to let the frontends decide how they wish to render these, >>> but removing the '*' without providing proper CSS to insert an '*' or >>> some other default rendering is a backwards step, and one specifically >&

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-08 Thread DM Smith
elease of the NASB. >> >> Troy >> >> >> On 02/05/2016 10:32 AM, Peter Von Kaehne wrote: >>> is this in svn head? Or simply a release? >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 05. Februar 2016 um 17:10 Uhr >>> *V

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-08 Thread DM Smith
ease of the NASB. >> >> Troy >> >> >> On 02/05/2016 10:32 AM, Peter Von Kaehne wrote: >>> is this in svn head? Or simply a release? >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> *Gesendet:* Freitag, 05. Februar 2016 um 17:10 Uhr >>> *Von:* "DM

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-08 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
to insert an '*' or > some other default rendering is a backwards step, and one specifically > affecting the release of the NASB. > > Troy > > > On 02/05/2016 10:32 AM, Peter Von Kaehne wrote: >> is this in svn head? Or simply a release? >> >> Pe

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-08 Thread DM Smith
> some other default rendering is a backwards step, and one specifically > affecting the release of the NASB. > > Troy > > > On 02/05/2016 10:32 AM, Peter Von Kaehne wrote: >> is this in svn head? Or simply a release? >> >> Peter >> >> *Ge

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-08 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
gt; *Gesendet:* Freitag, 05. Februar 2016 um 17:10 Uhr > *Von:* "DM Smith" > *An:* "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" > *Betreff:* Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element > At this point the code (osisxhtml) says: > if ((type == "add

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-07 Thread DM Smith
> On Feb 7, 2016, at 5:48 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > > You are probably right, but please look at the code and make suggestions. I > am stumped at the moment. > > Peter > > Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity and typos.On 7 Feb 2016 4:43 am, > Greg Hellings wrote: >> >> On Sat, Fe

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-07 Thread Peter von Kaehne
You are probably right, but please look at the code and make suggestions. I am stumped at the moment. Peter Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity and typos.On 7 Feb 2016 4:43 am, Greg Hellings wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 11

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-06 Thread Greg Hellings
On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 11:11 -0500, DM Smith wrote: >> The osis2mod program has changed the … to the milestoned >> version. It shouldn’t do that for type=“colophon”. > > Ok, I have committed support for non-milestoned colophon divs to appea

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-06 Thread DM Smith
Hey, I learned something new! May be old news to others or all. CSS allows styling based on any attribute. (http://www.w3schools.com/css/css_attribute_selectors.asp ) So .transChange[type=“added"] {…} will style added stuff In Him,

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-06 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 11:18 -0500, DM Smith wrote: >  > BTW, which render does Xiphos use, osishtmlhref or osisxhtml? osisxhtml ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-06 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On Sat, 2016-02-06 at 11:11 -0500, DM Smith wrote: > The osis2mod program has changed the … to the milestoned > version. It shouldn’t do that for type=“colophon”. Ok, I have committed support for non-milestoned colophon divs to appear as "class=colophon". Also committed changes to rdg, catchWord a

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-06 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 02/06/2016 11:18 AM, DM Smith wrote: > which render does Xiphos use, osishtmlhref or osisxhtml? Xiphos moved to osisxhtml in 2013. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instruction

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-06 Thread DM Smith
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 10:02 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > > On 02/06/2016 05:19 AM, David Haslam wrote: >> Would it be too much to ask that colophon text be rendered in a smaller font >> size than the main text? > ...iff it's done using a relative font size indicator. Shouldn’t it be handled in o

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-06 Thread DM Smith
The osis2mod program has changed the … to the milestoned version. It shouldn’t do that for type=“colophon”. — DM > On Feb 6, 2016, at 10:54 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > > On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 12:50 -0500, DM Smith wrote: >> Thanks! I did a quick read of the source looking for other problems.

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-06 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On Fri, 2016-02-05 at 12:50 -0500, DM Smith wrote: > Thanks! I did a quick read of the source looking for other problems. > Not seeing anything obvious. > > While you have the patient open, would you also add support for type=“colophon”> to at least put it on a next line? Outputting it as > a wo

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-06 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
On 02/06/2016 05:19 AM, David Haslam wrote: > Would it be too much to ask that colophon text be rendered in a smaller font > size than the main text? ...iff it's done using a relative font size indicator. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswir

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-06 Thread David Haslam
Would it be too much to ask that colophon text be rendered in a smaller font size than the main text? David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/transChange-within-a-rdg-element-tp4655995p4656006.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-05 Thread DM Smith
: "DM Smith" > An: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" > Betreff: Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element > SVN head. > > On Feb 5, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Peter Von Kaehne > wrote: > > is this in svn head? Or simply a release? >

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-05 Thread Peter Von Kaehne
I must have left it untouched. Sorry. Will fix.   Gesendet: Freitag, 05. Februar 2016 um 17:37 Uhr Von: "DM Smith" An: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" Betreff: Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element SVN head.   On Feb 5, 2016, at 12:32

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-05 Thread DM Smith
SVN head. > On Feb 5, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Peter Von Kaehne wrote: > > is this in svn head? Or simply a release? > > Peter > > Gesendet: Freitag, 05. Februar 2016 um 17:10 Uhr > Von: "DM Smith" > An: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-05 Thread Peter Von Kaehne
is this in svn head? Or simply a release?   Peter   Gesendet: Freitag, 05. Februar 2016 um 17:10 Uhr Von: "DM Smith" An: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" Betreff: Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element At this point the code (osisxhtml) s

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-05 Thread DM Smith
At this point the code (osisxhtml) says: if ((type == "added") || (type == "supplied")) outText("", buf, u); else if (type == "tenseChange") buf += "*"; Note: supplied is not a valid value for transChange and probably represents an earlier OSIS text. It really bother’s me

Re: [sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-05 Thread Greg Hellings
At this point, I believe that SWORD hands off styling like that to the app to do with CSS (for those apps using HTML output). Does it not? I don't thin it's using or , although I could be wrong. --Greg On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 10:26 AM, David Haslam wrote: > Something that DM and I have mooted. >

[sword-devel] transChange within a rdg element

2016-02-05 Thread David Haslam
Something that DM and I have mooted. When transChange is used within a rdg element (i.e. inside a note), and since SWORD renders text within a rdg as italics, then the text within the transChange ought ideally to be rendered as normal type in order to maintain the contrast with the other text that