Re: [sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

Just a thought - might this topic be worth discussing with the folk in the Tyndale STEP project? David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/seeking-consensus-on-OSIS-lemma-best-practice-tp4651158p4651180.htm

Re: [sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

On 10/13/2012 05:23 PM, Chris Little wrote: On 10/13/2012 6:12 AM, Daniel Owens wrote: Thanks, Chris. I had not thought of the latter solution, but that is what we need. This raises a fundamental question: how will front-ends find the right lexical entry? Currently, according to my understandin

Re: [sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

On 10/13/2012 6:12 AM, Daniel Owens wrote: Thanks, Chris. I had not thought of the latter solution, but that is what we need. This raises a fundamental question: how will front-ends find the right lexical entry? Currently, according to my understanding, a conf file may include Feature=HebrewDef.

Re: [sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

On 10/13/2012 02:43 AM, Chris Little wrote: On 10/12/2012 1:40 PM, Daniel Owens wrote: The markup would look like this: Hebrew (from Deuteronomy): תֹּאבֵדוּן֮ Aramaic (from Jeremiah): יֵאבַ֧דוּ The main problem I see is that other front-ends may not follow the process of looking for G or H an

Re: [sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

On 10/12/2012 1:40 PM, Daniel Owens wrote: The markup would look like this: Hebrew (from Deuteronomy): תֹּאבֵדוּן֮ Aramaic (from Jeremiah): יֵאבַ֧דוּ The main problem I see is that other front-ends may not follow the process of looking for G or H and then stripping the character before looking

Re: [sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

On 10/12/2012 7:23 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: Chris Little wrote: This is certainly bad OSIS encoding. It is also not a Sword convention. If anything is implemented that requires a language prefix like this, it represents a bug, whether in Sword or in BibleTime. Well...this is how SWModule has

Re: [sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

On 10/12/2012 07:23 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: Chris Little wrote: This is certainly bad OSIS encoding. It is also not a Sword convention. If anything is implemented that requires a language prefix like this, it represents a bug, whether in Sword or in BibleTime. Well...this is how SWModule has

Re: [sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

Chris Little wrote: >> This is certainly bad OSIS encoding. It is also not a Sword >> convention. If anything is implemented that requires a language prefix >> like this, it represents a bug, whether in Sword or in BibleTime. Well...this is how SWModule has done this since forever. Gary Holmlund

Re: [sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

On 10/12/2012 03:16 PM, Chris Little wrote: On 10/12/2012 1:40 PM, Daniel Owens wrote: Gary Holmlund and I are working on a problem related to the Westminster Hebrew Morphology (WHM) module. We need a consensus on markup practices for OSIS lemma. I was having a problem getting natural Hebrew le

Re: [sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

On 10/12/2012 1:40 PM, Daniel Owens wrote: Gary Holmlund and I are working on a problem related to the Westminster Hebrew Morphology (WHM) module. We need a consensus on markup practices for OSIS lemma. I was having a problem getting natural Hebrew lemma to look up an entry and display it in the

[sword-devel] seeking consensus on OSIS lemma best practice

Gary Holmlund and I are working on a problem related to the Westminster Hebrew Morphology (WHM) module. We need a consensus on markup practices for OSIS lemma. I was having a problem getting natural Hebrew lemma to look up an entry and display it in the mag window. Gary discovered that if "H"