On Fri, 7 Sep 2007, jonathon wrote:
> One start would be to rewrite the wikipedia articles for The Sword
> Project,,GnomeSword, etc.
> ( I also expect them all to be renominated for AfD status in the near future.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Sword_Project
Yo
Karl wrote:
> We need more and better PR such as the article Troy mentioned today.
One start would be to rewrite the wikipedia articles for The Sword
Project,,GnomeSword, etc.
( I also expect them all to be renominated for AfD status in the near future.)
xan
jonathon
__
I went surfing for anybody who's done reviews of Sword Project UIs. I
came across this:
http://www.fostertribe.org/biblesoftware.html
Regarding Sword Project, quote:
"For instance, the portion of the About box that describes TSP's freely
distributable status contains this gem: `write a tract mod
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[well, forwards]
> Bible Time appears to be more mature than GNOMESword, but mostly,
> choosing between them is more a matter of taste.
harumph!
:-)
I would disagree as to maturity -- I think they're pretty comparable in
that regard, and of course
http://blue-gnu.biz/content/crosswire_bible_society_offers_free_libre_bible_software_anyone_can_use
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your sett
