There you have it,
The new iPhone license is available:
http://www.macrumors.com/2008/10/23/apple-posts-revised-iphone-nda-agreement-and-readying-iphone-2-2-beta-2-firmware/
The license that requires logging in has all the usual FOSS stuff.
- nathan
According to the Linux.com article
(http:/
On Oct 22, 2008, at 1:29 AM, Nathan Youngman wrote:
>
> Chris,
>
> So what you're saying is the entire work would need to be distributed
> with GPL (2 or 3).
No, not GPLv3, as that is incompatible with v2. The only way that
would be true is if we relicensed our code to have the v2 or later
c
Am 22.10.2008 um 07:29 schrieb Nathan Youngman:
> Though not entirely relevant to Sword, the thing I find the most
> distasteful is when various open source licenses don't get along.
That's true. Open-Source should be "open source". After all one
license is more the other less open source.
M
Chris,
So what you're saying is the entire work would need to be distributed
with GPL (2 or 3).
Though it could link in, say an MIT licensed Regex library.
Whether a front-end is derived or merely attached is debatable... but
I don't feel like debating.
Though not entirely relevant to Sword
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg Hellings wrote:
>> As I understood it, the real barrier was the NDA for *released* code,
>> and that's the portion which was dropped. Thus, unless you're
>> registered in the for-pay ordeal, you probably won't be seei
Greg Hellings wrote:
> As I understood it, the real barrier was the NDA for *released* code,
> and that's the portion which was dropped. Thus, unless you're
> registered in the for-pay ordeal, you probably won't be seeing the new
> licensing in your e-mail. At least, that's how I interpreted it.
Nathan Youngman wrote:
>
> I noticed on the Sword Wiki that:
>
> "All frontends MUST be GPLv2 licensed."
> http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/Frontends:FeatureList
>
> But I don't believe that to be true. Any GPLv2-compatible license
> should be fine:
>
> http://www.g
As I understood it, the real barrier was the NDA for *released* code,
and that's the portion which was dropped. Thus, unless you're
registered in the for-pay ordeal, you probably won't be seeing the new
licensing in your e-mail. At least, that's how I interpreted it. I
likewise have not received
I still have not seen a new agreement (despite being registered for
iPhone development).
"Developers will receive a new agreement without an NDA covering
released software within a week or so."
http://developer.apple.com/iphone/program/
We were talking about the "iPhone licen
Hi Greg.
Am 06.10.2008 um 07:55 schrieb Greg Hellings:
> Manfred,
>
> > Yes, that may be.
> > Which sources of Eloquent have you tried compiling? This project is
> > rather old and you might want to use other backend sources.
> >
> > I'm trying to build the version out of SVN on googlecode. Is t
Manfred,
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:46 AM, Manfred Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Greg.
>
> Am 02.10.2008 um 10:06 schrieb Greg Hellings:
>
> > > I already have the SWORD library building against the iPhone SDK in
> > > XCode (the command-line building process simply doesn't work). I
> >
Am 02.10.2008 um 10:46 schrieb Manfred Bergmann:
> Hi Greg.
>
> Am 02.10.2008 um 10:06 schrieb Greg Hellings:
>
>>> I already have the SWORD library building against the iPhone SDK in
>>> XCode (the command-line building process simply doesn't work). I
>>> can't get Eloquent to build for iPhone
Hi Greg.
Am 02.10.2008 um 10:06 schrieb Greg Hellings:
> > I already have the SWORD library building against the iPhone SDK in
> > XCode (the command-line building process simply doesn't work). I
> > can't get Eloquent to build for iPhone because of a few missing
> > Cocoa-based headers which th
Manfred,
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 12:26 AM, Manfred Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Am 01.10.2008 um 21:17 schrieb Greg Hellings:
>
> > Manfred (and Chris),
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Manfred Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Good news for anyone wanting t
Am 01.10.2008 um 21:17 schrieb Greg Hellings:
> Manfred (and Chris),
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Manfred Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Good news for anyone wanting to start something native on the iPhone:
> http://developer.apple.com/iphone/program/
>
> I already have
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 3:20 PM, Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Greg Hellings wrote:
> >
> >
> > I already have the SWORD library building against the iPhone SDK in XCode
> > (the command-line building process simply doesn't work). I can't get
> > Eloquent to build for iPhone because o
Greg Hellings wrote:
>
>
> I already have the SWORD library building against the iPhone SDK in XCode
> (the command-line building process simply doesn't work). I can't get
> Eloquent to build for iPhone because of a few missing Cocoa-based headers
> which the iPhone system doesn't have. I suppose
Manfred (and Chris),
On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Manfred Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Good news for anyone wanting to start something native on the iPhone:
> http://developer.apple.com/iphone/program/
I already have the SWORD library building against the iPhone SDK in XCode
Hi.
Good news for anyone wanting to start something native on the iPhone:
http://developer.apple.com/iphone/program/
God bless,
Manfred
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instr
19 matches
Mail list logo
