On Sunday 27 July 2003 19:02, Leon Brooks wrote:
> If they're still in contrib, perhaps we should ask again that they trot
> across to main. There was some discussion of this on Cooker a while
> back.
>
> Cheers; Leon
They still are as far as I know I have not checked in the last few months but
h
On 10-Aug-2003 Brook Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 27 July 2003 19:02, Leon Brooks wrote:
> into sine they don't want to include the tora(?spelling) and whatever
> other
> manuscripts also. At any rate it and gnomesword are both there.
Torah ("teaching" in Hebrew)? So are caslled the first five bo
Joel,
After searching through my emails and extracting the bits that I feel
support my 7/17 email, the result is attached to the end of this
message. There were many irc sessions that I feel also added quite a
bit, but I have no history of those conversations.
Though I understand your frustra
On Mon, 28 Jul 2003 02:54, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> The current ones in co[n]trib were placed
> there by buchan but were originally done by me
If they're still in contrib, perhaps we should ask again that they trot
across to main. There was some discussion of this on Cooker a while
back.
Cheers;
On Sunday 27 July 2003 07:32, Leon Brooks wrote:
> Yah, they're ramping up to the 9.2 release now (should hit the streets
> in September).
>
> Currently Texstar provides 3rd-party RPMs for Mandrake on his site
> (start at http://www.pclinuxonline.com/) but I think we've managed to
> get at least th
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 22:04, Brook Humphrey wrote:
> make sure they are in mandrake also
Yah, they're ramping up to the 9.2 release now (should hit the streets
in September).
Currently Texstar provides 3rd-party RPMs for Mandrake on his site
(start at http://www.pclinuxonline.com/) but I think we
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:58, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Chris Little wrote:
> > Linux binaries won't be released; Linux users who don't know how to
> > compile for themselves need to learn. Mac binaries probably won't be
> > released either, for the same reason. We only re
- Original Message -
From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Don makes a good point that we want to enable people to easily place
> their content into our software-- and I agree.
>
> In my opinion the solution is to:
>
> 1) make it easy for anyone to import content for SWORD, and
>
Joel,
Public comment deserves public response:
Over the 2 months that you worked on your extensions to the Search
code, we had numerous emails / chat sessions about what I would not
accept in the engine, namely: 1) adding 2 megs of source code of someone
elses project just to parse logi
On July 16, 2003 17:39, Chris Little wrote:
> Seriously, the single greatest problem with Sword is probably the
> inordinate ratio of people crying for new features to the number people
> they expect to implement them.
This is easy to say. However, until new developers are able to be integrated
i
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
Ahh. May I propose to change "SWORD Module add-ins" on
http://crosswire.org/sword/develop/swordmodule/index.jsp to "Creating a
SWORD Module"?
It will make it a lot easier to find I guess.
Good idea. Done.
Could you (or someone else) add crumbtails to the site? Now t
At 11:30 PM 7/16/2003 -0700, you wrote:
John,
and did a Project|Build All Projects
Doh!!! Out of habit I just did a build, not a Build All projects. 580
seconds later (I like that they give you the time in the title bar!), I
completed the build. Thanks for your help and patience!
-John
> > Why not add a simple edit function in Sword itself, with just some
> simple
> > functions, like font-properties and text-references, something like E-
> Sword
> > has.
>
> Are you offering to work on it? ;)
As soon as I have some time (which is very soon, I hope, I'm currently in
project th
Why not add a simple edit function in Sword itself, with just some simple
functions, like font-properties and text-references, something like E-Sword
has.
Are you offering to work on it? ;) We do have a commentary editor in
the windows software, and I believe the linux apps have this feature, as
> > Don makes a good point that we want to enable people to easily place
> > their content into our software-- and I agree.
>
> My arguments really have nothing to do with who creates the document
> itself, just how well it is encoded electronically. I'm not going to
> spend any time writing
John,
I tried compiling myself again. I removed both the sword and icu-sword
folders, checked them out of cvs, and did a search for Tnt*.h*
Nothing existed.
Then I went straight to:
D:\usr\scribe\src\sword\apps\windoze\CBuilder6\BibleCS\swordprj.bpg
and did a Project|Build All Projects
Every
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Chris Little wrote:
> Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
>
> > But to this day I have not been able to understand from the crosswire
> > website how to go about and create a module if I wanted to. And I have
> > been looking into some Dutch documents I might want to add. But to this
Message -
From: "John Baima" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD
> At 03:19 PM 7/12/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> >Hello all you Windows would-be devel
At 03:43 PM 7/16/2003 -0700, you wrote:
John,
Yeah, it seems the beta version of wincvs is a little different
than the stable version. I thought, at one time, we had instructions for
both online. Anyway, glad you got it checked out.
It sounds like you are opening the sword.bpr
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
I amrather familiar with HTML and SGML assume I can get my head around
other descriptive languages.
We recommend using OSIS 1.5. The webpage is
http://www.bibletechnologies.net/, the schema is
http://www.bibletechnologies.net/osisCore.1.5.xsd, and draft
documentation
His views are by no means representative of the
majority here.
But his views are representative of the people who have made 90% of the
module import tools. If people don't like those views, they can make
their own tools--then their opinions will matter. Until then: what we
have is generally w
John,
Yeah, it seems the beta version of wincvs is a little different than
the stable version. I thought, at one time, we had instructions for
both online. Anyway, glad you got it checked out.
It sounds like you are opening the sword.bpr file and NOT the
swordprj.bpg Maybe I'm wrong, but t
Hey guys,
Just a few comments.
Chris is back at Berkeley for the summer, so, in theme, he's just being
dissenting. His views are by no means representative of the majority here.
He does make a good point in that it would be MUCH MORE WORK FOR HIM if
we had a million people submitting
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Chris Little wrote:
> Leon Brooks wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:06, Chris Little wrote:
> >
> >>And it nonetheless stands; Linux users who don't know how to compile
> >>for themselves need to learn (or move back to Windows).
> >
> >
> > Or, to read this another way, if
At 03:19 PM 7/12/2003 -0700, you wrote:
Hello all you Windows would-be developers, we have really good news.
So, we're seeking Windows developers; no excuses now!
Here are the steps to freely compile our free software freely :)
Follow the WinCVS instructions to checkout the source code:
http://
Leon Brooks wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:06, Chris Little wrote:
And it nonetheless stands; Linux users who don't know how to compile
for themselves need to learn (or move back to Windows).
Or, to read this another way, if you're an _administrator_ instead of a
user, compiling should be no p
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 8:40 pm, Chris Little wrote:
> A version of xml2gbs compiled for Win32 is available at our standard
> utils location: http://crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/utils/win32/
>
> osis2vs is still beta software may need updates for OSIS 1.5. So it
> will be released when it is
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 04:06, Chris Little wrote:
> And it nonetheless stands; Linux users who don't know how to compile
> for themselves need to learn (or move back to Windows).
Or, to read this another way, if you're an _administrator_ instead of a
user, compiling should be no problem. Users of th
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 00:44, Pham, Khoi wrote:
> I finally got the Windows version compiled and linked with BCB6 after
> downloading both Sword and icu-sword from CVS.
Dunno if it's been raised before, but it's possible to produce
MS-Windows EXEs from GCC, either on Linux or using MinGW under
MS-W
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Chris Little wrote:
> Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Chris Little wrote:
> >
> >>Linux binaries won't be released; Linux users who don't know how to
> >>compile for themselves need to learn. Mac binaries probably won't be
> >>released either, for the
Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Chris Little wrote:
Linux binaries won't be released; Linux users who don't know how to
compile for themselves need to learn. Mac binaries probably won't be
released either, for the same reason. We only release Win32 binaries of
the utils becau
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Chris Little wrote:
> Linux binaries won't be released; Linux users who don't know how to
> compile for themselves need to learn. Mac binaries probably won't be
> released either, for the same reason. We only release Win32 binaries of
> the utils because, for Windows, com
A version of xml2gbs compiled for Win32 is available at our standard
utils location: http://crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/utils/win32/
osis2vs is still beta software may need updates for OSIS 1.5. So it
will be released when it is ready.
Linux binaries won't be released; Linux users who do
] free Windows compiler for SWORD
Hello all you Windows would-be developers, we have really good news.
Borland has been in the habbit of releasing different levels of their
tools at different price tiers, and sometimes they have a 'Personal' or
'Open' edition which is free
Hey Troy,
wow, thanks for the detailed description!!
I pasted it to
http://www.crosswire.org/ucgi-bin/twiki/view/Swordwin/GettingStarted for
future reference, for all the interested Windows developers to come.
In case it needs to be updated, please change / correct it there.
Martin
Am Sonnta
Hello all you Windows would-be developers, we have really good news.
Borland has been in the habbit of releasing different levels of their
tools at different price tiers, and sometimes they have a 'Personal' or
'Open' edition which is free for personal use or opensource development.
Now, I'd p
36 matches
Mail list logo
