Yes, this can probably be corrected. It may be a while before I get to this,
though...
On 12/15/19 12:38 AM, Tobias Klein wrote:
>
> Dear Michael,
>
> I found that the engNET2016eb has inconsistent Strong's ids in its markup.
>
> Example based on Ecclesiastes 2:26. I inserted line breaks for read
Dear Michael,
I found that the engNET2016eb has inconsistent Strong's ids in its markup.
Example based on Ecclesiastes 2:26. I inserted line breaks for readability.
only
to
give
it
to
the
one
who pleases
God.
In this example it looks like some of the Strong's lemma's have a
leading zero ins
