On 12/08/2014 11:06 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Exactly, which is the reason why I haven’t put there much
> instructions about how to use it.
OK, thanx, I hadn't understood the limited nature of COPR.
I already committed your wscript patch.
___
sword-devel
On 2014-12-08, 12:41 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> I don't understand why you're pushing this into publicly visible repos
This is not anything official, COPR is used exactly for this
purpose (somehow similar to PPAs in the Ubuntu world;
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Copr) for shaking ou
The EPEL 7 packages are still in limbo. I was able to take a crack at
them early last week, but then unexpected family complications ruined
my ability to reliably get to my development machine for much of last
week. There is a problem at present with building Xiphos on the ppc64
architecture becaus
On 08/12/14 13:41, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
>>> Instructions not filled in by author.
>
> I don't even know what that means.
This is a common practice for COPR projects which are just one-off for
testing purposes. This is just a package for testing your upstream tarball.
Installation on Fedora(19-
On 12/08/2014 06:57 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> xiphos.spec file is broken on RHEL-7 in many ways
That's ... interesting, because my .spec is copied with a few mods to
identify it as being for personal use from the one Greg uses for regular
Fedora builds. It is used only for my personal builds that go
On 2014-12-07, 18:53 GMT, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnomesword/upload/Xiphos/Testing/
xiphos.spec file is broken on RHEL-7 in many ways so I have
rather build it in COPR
(http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mcepl/xiphos-av11n/;
I needed also biblesync and new swo
https://sourceforge.net/projects/gnomesword/upload/Xiphos/Testing/
If you wish to try Xiphos with av11n support, please see the URL and
give it a shot. There are likely problems remaining and you may see a
crash, in which case I would dearly love a report of how it was caused;
there is stuff goin
