On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 3:46 PM, David Haslam wrote:
>
> How soon before the Win32 package becomes available for download?
>
> David
I spent my 5 hours on it yesterday and I still have quite a bit of
work to do. So I have to find some more time to finish it up. I hope
within the week, but we'll s
How soon before the Win32 package becomes available for download?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Xiphos-3-1-4-source-tarball-is-released-tp2997831p3012709.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
On 22 October 2010 17:55, David Haslam wrote:
>
> It's not just a matter of strict dependencies.
>
> Xiphos for Windows also comes packed with all the Sword Win32 utilities.
>
> As there have been some bugs fixed in these between 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 - it
> would be frustrating for Xiphos users to not
te:
>
> It's not just a matter of strict dependencies.
>
> Xiphos for Windows also comes packed with all the Sword Win32 utilities.
>
> As there have been some bugs fixed in these between 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 - it
> would be frustrating for Xiphos users to not have these as part of the
> Xiphos 3.1.4 in
It's not just a matter of strict dependencies.
Xiphos for Windows also comes packed with all the Sword Win32 utilities.
As there have been some bugs fixed in these between 1.6.1 and 1.6.2 - it
would be frustrating for Xiphos users to not have these as part of the
Xiphos 3.1.4 installation.
I th
Matthew Talbert writes:
> more timely releases would make that job much easier all around
Amen, yea verily, and rah-rah-rah.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to u
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 12:13 PM, David Haslam wrote:
>
> Should we expect that the Xiphos packages will be built using SWORD 1.6.2 ?
>
> In view of Troy's finall call, this would make good sense.
If you're asking about the Windows package then I intend to use 1.6.2.
However, I will use whatever
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 19:13, David Haslam wrote:
> Should we expect that the Xiphos packages will be built using SWORD 1.6.2 ?
Xihpos 3.1.4 does not seem to have any strict dependencies on SWORD
1.6.2. As such you should NOT expect it to be compiled against
anything in particular, whatever happ
The intent had been to release X3.1.4 when S1.6.2 came out. But we had
gotten done all that was needed, with more time to spare than we could
use. I'm sure that package builders will be aware of the release of
S1.6.2.
___
sword-devel mailing list: swor
Should we expect that the Xiphos packages will be built using SWORD 1.6.2 ?
In view of Troy's finall call, this would make good sense.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Xiphos-3-1-4-source-tarball-is-released-tp2997831p3000551.html
Sent from the SWORD
We were overdue for a release. Lots of new features, mostly display-
related, some navigation-related, tooltips everywhere, sword:// handling
in Linux, many other things. See the SourceForge files area. Package
builders should be doing their thing soon.
_
11 matches
Mail list logo
