Matthew Talbert wrote:
>> I could, but I think it is a low priority for me and for the Xiphos folk.
>> (Who may not want to know if it works there ;)
>
> If it works, would that mean we would have to support it? (desperately
> praying it won't!!)
I have made for the wiki an executive decision and
> I could, but I think it is a low priority for me and for the Xiphos folk.
> (Who may not want to know if it works there ;)
If it works, would that mean we would have to support it? (desperately
praying it won't!!)
Matthew
___
sword-devel mailing list
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:02 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
DM Smith wrote:
I have a Windows 98 laptop
Could you for curiosity sake test xiphos on it?
I could, but I think it is a low priority for me and for the Xiphos
folk. (Who may not want to know if it works there ;)
-- DM
__
> Could you for curiosity sake test xiphos on it?
I can almost 100% guarantee it won't work. There are Windows api
functions being used that were simply non-existent back then.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire
DM Smith wrote:
> I have a Windows 98 laptop
Could you for curiosity sake test xiphos on it?
Peter
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your se
On Mar 2, 2009, at 7:36 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Chris Little wrote:
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but
maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate
instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins
Chris Little wrote:
>
>
> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but maybe
>> with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate instead
>> of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins do not work).
>
> This may seem a minor matter
On Mar 2, 2009, at 5:58 PM, DM Smith wrote:
With sorting the page is too wide to print in landscape without
truncation.
Never mind. It shrinks nicely.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinf
The table is taking shape nicely. Don't feel like you need to use the
graphics just cause they are there.
Nice work everyone.
Daniel Blake
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Brian Fernandes wrote:
Unfortunately I could not figure out how to easily import the {{yes}} /
{{no}} templates into our Wik
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Brian Fernandes wrote:
Unfortunately I could not figure out how to easily import the {{yes}} /
{{no}} templates into our Wiki, perhaps best left to someone with more
experience. I can try again later tomorrow if nobody gets to it by then
- if you think this is a good
Chris Little wrote:
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins do not work).
This may seem a minor matter, but I'm not s
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
The OS support I would simply do as previous - one row only, but maybe
with icons to make faster to read. Win95+ or WinXP+ is adequate instead
of a whole list of variants (unless newer Wins do not work).
This may seem a minor matter, but I'm not sure whether the curre
Brian Fernandes wrote:
> Unfortunately I could not figure out how to easily import the {{yes}} /
> {{no}} templates into our Wiki, perhaps best left to someone with more
> experience. I can try again later tomorrow if nobody gets to it by then
> - if you think this is a good idea.
I have created
Brian Fernandes wrote:
> DM,
>
> Just a few notes on the layout; these changes look great, and the table
> is definitely easier to read. I do agree that the columns are too narrow.
Seconded.
> I was recently looking at this wiki page:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_browsers
>
DM,
Just a few notes on the layout; these changes look great, and the table
is definitely easier to read. I do agree that the columns are too narrow.
I was recently looking at this wiki page:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_web_browsers
The comparison tables on this page look pre
DM Smith wrote:
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Putting data into rows and frontends into columns is so obvious that I
feel now stupid. It is probably too late to fix this for the wiki -
unless you, Eeli, volunteer - the amount has become too much.
I'll see about doing th
Hi Peter ..
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Wrt rating of interfaces - sorry, Barry I really can not see how we can
put this anywhere without the most almighty flame war.
I agree with you. In this instance, I was just thinking back to a
number of feature requests aimed at BibleCS because book/c
Barry Drake writes:
> BibleCS limits footnotes to 1221 characters. Some of our footnotes
> are at least double that; I've no idea how big the longest is.
Eccl 1:1#1, 6559 characters as rendered in Xiphos; original source
markup, somewhat larger.
___
s
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:43 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Putting data into rows and frontends into columns is so obvious that I
feel now stupid. It is probably too late to fix this for the wiki -
unless you, Eeli, volunteer - the amount has become too much.
I'll see about doing this.
-- DM
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> Quoting Barry Drake :
>
>>
>> I suggest an additional column (or more). 'Footnote Handling' marked
>> as 'complete' or 'limited' (or somesuch). Another point that we might
>> want to consider is navigation on a scale of 0 to 5. BibleCS might be
>> around 2, and Xiphos ar
Quoting Barry Drake :
I suggest an additional column (or more). 'Footnote Handling' marked
as 'complete' or 'limited' (or somesuch). Another point that we might
want to consider is navigation on a scale of 0 to 5. BibleCS might be
around 2, and Xiphos around 5 and so on
I wouldn
Hi Peter .
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
why are you concerned? Fix it please.
Please accept my apologies. I didn't mean to criticise, just to make
observations.
I haven't yet looked at altering the Wiki, and just now, I'm very pushed
for time. But yes - I do realise that this is not in its
Thanks Brian,
Brian Fernandes wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Truly a great effort and a good list of features for frontend authors to
> refer to and improve.
It started as a way for users to compare, but I think ultimatrely it
will be much more useful to developers etc.
>
> I want to edit the FireBible
DM Smith wrote:
> Peter, (and others)
> A couple of thoughts regarding this wiki.
>
> First, I think it is going very well. Kudos to all that have helped. I
> can see a lot of effort has gone into this!
Thanks
>
> I think it would be good to have an explanation of the column headings
> under eac
Barry Drake wrote:
> Hi there .
>
> I've only just had chance to take a proper look at the Wiki page. It
> seems good as far as it goes, but I'm very concerned about the things it
> doesn't compare.
why are you concerned? Fix it please. The bulk of the table was produced
by myself last nigh
Peter, (and others)
A couple of thoughts regarding this wiki.
First, I think it is going very well. Kudos to all that have helped. I
can see a lot of effort has gone into this!
I think it would be good to have an explanation of the column headings
under each table. Many of the headings are
Hi there .
I've only just had chance to take a proper look at the Wiki page. It
seems good as far as it goes, but I'm very concerned about the things it
doesn't compare. I know I keep going on about BibleCS and NET, but that
is an important issue to me. Load NET and look at Gen 1:26. M
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Brian Fernandes
wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Truly a great effort and a good list of features for frontend authors to
> refer to and improve.
>
> I want to edit the FireBible rows a bit, but would like to make a few
> clarifications first; I will wait for your response befo
Peter,
Truly a great effort and a good list of features for frontend authors to
refer to and improve.
I want to edit the FireBible rows a bit, but would like to make a few
clarifications first; I will wait for your response before editing the
tables or you can go ahead and edit it yourself.
riginal Message-
From: "Peter von Kaehne"
To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
Sent: 3/1/09 9:39 AM
Subject: [sword-devel] Wiki front end comparison - a intermediate summary
I have worked now several hours on the wiki comparison page.
What I tried to ach
I have worked now several hours on the wiki comparison page.
What I tried to achieve is reduction of as many as possible entries into
simple yes/no entries (+/- short comment) to make it as easy as possible
to actually compare.
This meant obviously that the number of list columns has gone up
dra
31 matches
Mail list logo
