Re: [sword-devel] Version 1.00 Feature List

2008-07-16 Thread David Overcash
Also, I noticed that the old swordreader website ( http://crosswire.org/swordreader/index.jsp ) has the only download listed as version 1.0.0 (http://crosswire.org/swordreader/download.jsp ). Perhaps given the renewed focus on the user interface and usability should qualify this as a new build (1.

Re: [sword-devel] Version 1.00 Feature List

2008-07-14 Thread David Overcash
> > Once the developers had this hammered out (I hope documented)--work began, > and I believe here is someone here who knows what has gone into each > package > to enhance it. As we have seen, there are also members here who know what > went into the code, as test code, and once th results were g

Re: [sword-devel] Version 1.00 Feature List

2008-07-14 Thread John Gammon
-Original Message- From: SonWon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 10:27 PM To: CrossWire Developers List Subject: [sword-devel] Version 1.00 Feature List So I am thinking about what to work on (advanced menubar, scrollbar, etc.) and it dawns on me I don't even

Re: [sword-devel] Version 1.00 Feature List

2008-07-14 Thread SonWon
Yes, swordreader it is, sorry for not being more clear. David Overcash wrote: > You're talking about SwordReader, correct? > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:26 PM, SonWon <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > wrote: > > So I am thinking about what to work on (advanced menubar, scrollba

Re: [sword-devel] Version 1.00 Feature List

2008-07-14 Thread David Overcash
You're talking about SwordReader, correct? On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 8:26 PM, SonWon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So I am thinking about what to work on (advanced menubar, scrollbar, > etc.) and it dawns on me I don't even know what the goals are for the > release. My time would likely be more pro

[sword-devel] Version 1.00 Feature List

2008-07-14 Thread SonWon
So I am thinking about what to work on (advanced menubar, scrollbar, etc.) and it dawns on me I don't even know what the goals are for the release. My time would likely be more production to focus on getting version one out the door. With that said I may focus on some other area of the reader