On 2018-01-03, 16:50 GMT, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> When Troy discussed the recent new catholic versifications
> I advised him not to accept these into the current release
> unless someone else considers them as a) needed and b)
> correctly done. When Domcox put his 3 French versifications in
>
There's an important distinction between not maintaining a revision controlled
source text and having copies of a source text to process at a particular point
in time.
There's also a difference between what gets officially stored on the CrossWire
server and what gets stored unofficially by any
Le 04/01/2018 à 18:09, David Haslam a écrit :
> Everyone - please understand that CrossWire does *not* maintain the
> source text files for any SWORD modules apart from the flagship *KJV*
> and *KJVA* modules.
Ok it is clear, but what you do with texts send by people for the module
creation (Exam
://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Versifications
> Local Time: 4 January 2018 3:48 PM
> UTC Time: 4 January 2018 15:48
> From: lafricai...@gmail.com
> To: sword-devel@crosswire.org
>
> Le 04/01/2018 à 12:17, Peter Von Ka
Le 04/01/2018 à 12:17, Peter Von Kaehne a écrit :
>> Von: Cyrille
> I would like to react to this message, I hope that I will not hurt
>> anyone, if my remarks are too direct, be indulgent knowing that English
>> is not my native language.
> No worries whatsoever, Cyrille, English is also not m
On 2018-01-04, 09:08 GMT, Cyrille wrote:
> Afterwards, I would like to add my point of view regarding
> Catholic modules. I deplore the lack of initiative on the part
> of Catholics (I am, so I do not accuse anyone from outside),
> the obstinacy to keep the rights and the refusal to freely
> sp
> Von: Cyrille
I would like to react to this message, I hope that I will not hurt
> anyone, if my remarks are too direct, be indulgent knowing that English
> is not my native language.
No worries whatsoever, Cyrille, English is also not my first language either.
Many of us are using it solely
Hello,
I would like to react to this message, I hope that I will not hurt
anyone, if my remarks are too direct, be indulgent knowing that English
is not my native language.
First, I thank each and every one of you for the wonderful work you have
done for all Bible readers and Christians in particul
Dear all,
There are a bunch of sometimes confused and sometimes confusing comments
currently on a variety of threads, so here a short summary of current policy,
reasons behind it and future re versifications.
1) Loading versification schemes takes time on low resource environments,
making prog
On Jul 3, 2013, at 3:54 PM, Chris Burrell wrote:
> Hi
>
> Do versifications sometimes have different verse orders to each other.
>
> Is this something Sword copes with/is intending to cater for?
>
> My aim is to be able to do a text comparison verse for verse, and so assuming
> I have the m
As noted by Troy, this is not an issue once the mapping facility is baked into
SWORD. It will cope with books having different ordering of keys.
When showing parallel content, one translation is picked as the master. Those
verses are shown in order. Corresponding verses from the other translatio
SWORD does not support out-of-numerical-order v11n systems, e.g., one
Bible might decide to number its verses 1,5,2,3,4,6,7. We do not plan
to have a facility to support this. The argument has been made on
threads-past which basically says: changing the logic of chapter/verse
from integer log
And (for example) if you wish to query the whole of the JPS module using book
names, it will not do to specify *Gen-Mal*.
You'd need to remember that in the Tanakh, the last book is *II Chronicles*.
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Versifications-and-verse
On 4 Jul 2013, at 14:01, Chris Little wrote:
> Book ordering differences are a trivial case, already handled by
> versification system definitions. E.g. the German and Luther versification
> systems differ, in the NT, only in book order. If you query Heb-Rev in
> German, you'll get the content
Book ordering differences are a trivial case, already handled by
versification system definitions. E.g. the German and Luther
versification systems differ, in the NT, only in book order. If you
query Heb-Rev in German, you'll get the contents of 9 books. In Luther,
you would get only 4 books.
Hi David
Book order isn't such an issue because you don't tend to line up passages
across book boundaries.But I guess that's an interesting question, since it
would mean that Gen-Ex could mean different things in different
versifications. Presumably we're never going to support book ordering being
Maybe the title should have included the phrase "book order".
As is fairly well known, the book order for the Epistles is different in
Eastern Canon than in the Western Canon.
This is just one such peculiarity for the NT.
There is also that odd move of some verses to a different chapter in Romans
So, my understanding from all the previous emails, is No we don't cope for
books with different orders of keys. However these do happen. Moreover, the
more general case of content from 1 verse switched with the content of
another is more prevalent.
So it's quite feasible to have a system that maps
Response from Michael below.
On 3 July 2013 21:25, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
> On 07/03/2013 10:07 AM, Chris Burrell wrote:
> >
> > In your example about the Psalms, within the versification itself you
> still have the verses in the same order, so that wouldn't be a problem. But
> I thi
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> Chris,
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Chris Burrell wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Do versifications sometimes have different verse orders to each other.
>>
>> Is this something Sword copes with/is intending to cater for?
>>
>
> My understanding
Chris,
On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 2:54 PM, Chris Burrell wrote:
> Hi
>
> Do versifications sometimes have different verse orders to each other.
>
> Is this something Sword copes with/is intending to cater for?
>
My understanding is that no, we do not cater to books, chapters or verses
being out of
> Hi Michael
>
> In your example about the Psalms, within the versification itself you
> still have the verses in the same order, so that wouldn't be a problem. But
> I think you're saying you might have the content of verse 1 and the content
> of verse 2 swapped around... Is that right? Would the
On 07/03/2013 09:54 AM, Chris Burrell
wrote:
Hi
Do versifications sometimes have different verse
orders to each other.
Yes, unfortunately.
Is this something Sword copes with/
Hi
Do versifications sometimes have different verse orders to each other.
Is this something Sword copes with/is intending to cater for?
My aim is to be able to do a text comparison verse for verse, and so
assuming I have the mappings between each verse, can I take two lists and
work my way down.
Hi DJ .
DJ Ortley wrote:
> Though I've not submitted any of my work, I've been slowly working on
> the genbook based bible thing in the little bits of free time I have.
If you are not yet ready to share your work with the group, I wonder if
you might have time to send me your implemen
Each Bible has its own versification system. We will keep that
versification system within the Sword module when we transition to
GenBooks. So the KJV will have the KJV versification. The NASB will have
a similar but slightly different system. The WLC, Aleppo Codex, & JPS
modules will have a sy
Though I've not submitted any of my work, I've been slowly working on the
genbook based bible thing in the little bits of free time I have. I don't
know if what I end up producing will ever be something that would be
considered for inclusion in the main branch of the Sword API.
And, just as many
The last few days I had an exchange of emails with someone on
sword-support who complained about wrong order of books in the Hebrew Bible.
It became clear that he was looking for a Jewish style ordered Bible and
ours follows the KJV as everything else in Crosswire too.
I explained this to him an
28 matches
Mail list logo
