On 24/04/12 01:26, Daniel Owens wrote:
Yes. Thanks for all the help on this one. I think it's led me to a
weird bug in BibleTime though. Please try this: In Bibletime, open
the NET bible. Hover over a footnote. The footnote is properly
displayed in the mag. Now close BibleTime and re-open
On 04/23/2012 02:51 PM, Barry Drake wrote:
On 23/04/12 16:17, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
The information Dmitrijs asked me for did give me the information I
needed
to sort the problem.
I'm glad you got sorted it out =
Mixing development repositories, can lead to all sort of weird stuff.
Y
On 04/23/2012 03:51 PM, Barry Drake wrote:
On 23/04/12 16:17, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
The information Dmitrijs asked me for did give me the information I
needed
to sort the problem.
I'm glad you got sorted it out =
Mixing development repositories, can lead to all sort of weird stuff.
Ye
On 23/04/12 16:17, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
The information Dmitrijs asked me for did give me the information I needed
to sort the problem.
I'm glad you got sorted it out =
Mixing development repositories, can lead to all sort of weird stuff.
Yes. Thanks for all the help on this one. I th
On 23 April 2012 15:35, Greg Hellings wrote:
> From the CMakeLists.txt file:
>
> SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE "-Wall -O2 -fexceptions")
> SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_DEBUG "-Wall -Werror -O2 -ggdb -fexceptions")
>
> It is the -Werror switch, only enabled in Debug builds, that causes
> the deprecati
On 23 April 2012 15:14, Barry Drake wrote:
> On 23/04/12 13:49, Greg Hellings wrote:
>>
>> If you want to get more to the bottom of it, try providing Dmitrijs
>> with the information he specified, but it sounds like you are drawing
>> the official Ubuntu package of BibleTime and the PPA package of
On 23 April 2012 13:49, Greg Hellings wrote:
> Xiphos 3.1.5 requires SWORD SVN. In the Crosswire Ubuntu PPA current
> SVN of SWORD is named libsword9.
>
Xiphos 3.1.5 does not require Sword SVN, only recommends it. (I did
the build script for xiphos)
libsword9 is not svn of sword. It is still 1.6
Awesome. So it is as I suggested. A user who downloads and builds
Bibletime, not in debug mode, wouldn't see the error, and they would be
able to upgrade their SWORD library without running into the problem?
Cooleo. Thanks for the details.
On 04/23/2012 04:35 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
From
>From the CMakeLists.txt file:
SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE "-Wall -O2 -fexceptions")
SET(CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_DEBUG "-Wall -Werror -O2 -ggdb -fexceptions")
It is the -Werror switch, only enabled in Debug builds, that causes
the deprecation warnings to be show stoppers. Last I checked Debian
On 23/04/12 13:49, Greg Hellings wrote:
If you want to get more to the bottom of it, try providing Dmitrijs
with the information he specified, but it sounds like you are drawing
the official Ubuntu package of BibleTime and the PPA package of Xiphos
to get the conflict you indicated.
You are rig
Not disputing the long term desire to not build against deprecated API
methods (that's why we deprecate), and I certainly understand the policy
to not release Bibletime until it is not using any deprecated methods of
the most recent SWORD library, but I can't see how it is useful to cause
Bible
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Not disputing any of this, but I'm curious why BT can't compile against SVN.
> I don't believe we've intentionally made any API interface changes in a
> while, and we try our hardest to be backward compatible. If you let me
> know, I ca
Not disputing any of this, but I'm curious why BT can't compile against
SVN. I don't believe we've intentionally made any API interface changes
in a while, and we try our hardest to be backward compatible. If you
let me know, I can have a look at what we broke.
Troy
On 04/23/2012 02:49 PM,
Xiphos 3.1.5 requires SWORD SVN. In the Crosswire Ubuntu PPA current
SVN of SWORD is named libsword9.
BibleTime 2.9.1 cannot be built against SWORD SVN but only against
SWORD 1.6.2. In Ubuntu's current release this version of SWORD is
named libsword8.
There is a branch in BibleTime's git reposito
On 23 April 2012 12:40, Barry Drake wrote:
> On 23/04/12 12:11, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>>
>> do not mix PPAs with official archive.
>>
>
> I understand that. What I'm doing is reporting that there is a problem in
> the packages held in Ubuntu 12.04 repo. I'm asking whoever is responsible
> for
On 23/04/12 12:11, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
do not mix PPAs with official archive.
I understand that. What I'm doing is reporting that there is a problem
in the packages held in Ubuntu 12.04 repo. I'm asking whoever is
responsible for submissions to Ubuntu to get things up to date as soon
do not mix PPAs with official archive.
What do
$ apt-cache policy bibletime
$ apt-cache policy xiphos
$ apt-cache policy libsword-dev
Say?
On 23 April 2012 09:57, Barry Drake wrote:
> On 23/04/12 02:46, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
>>
>> I wasn't aware, but you'll have to be more specific: What so
On 23/04/12 06:44, Chris Little wrote:
I don't observe any problem installing or running BibleTime & Xiphos
on 12.04.
I'm assuming you are not using the packaged binaries from the 12.04
repos since Xiphos was packaged with libsword9?
God bless,Barry.
--
From Barry Drake (The Revd) H
On 23/04/12 02:46, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
I wasn't aware, but you'll have to be more specific: What sort of
dependency conflicts? What does apt-get complain about?
Specifically, the packages offered under 12.04 use libsword8 for
BibleTime and libsword9 for Xiphos. If BibleTime is installed fi
On 04/22/2012 06:46 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
Barry Drake writes:
I just discovered that Bibletime and Xiphos can't be installed together
from the Ubuntu packages for 12.04 because of dependency conflicts.
I wasn't aware, but you'll have to be more specific: What sort of
dependency conflicts
Barry Drake writes:
> I just discovered that Bibletime and Xiphos can't be installed together
> from the Ubuntu packages for 12.04 because of dependency conflicts.
I wasn't aware, but you'll have to be more specific: What sort of
dependency conflicts? What does apt-get complain about?
_
I just discovered that Bibletime and Xiphos can't be installed together
from the Ubuntu packages for 12.04 because of dependency conflicts. I
used to like having both frontends available. I just wondered if folk
were aware of the current situation and whether this will alter any time
soon?
Hi there I've just logged a new bug with Xiphos on Ubuntu 12.04
Alpha 1. The report is at: 899...@bugs.launchpad.net
If anyone wants me to look at anything to help with this, I can try.
The bug is described as: Title: xiphos crashed with SIGSEGV in
sword::SWBuf::SWBuf() - oh, and it is ve
23 matches
Mail list logo
