> > I you want to get fancy, you could set Robinson as your Glossary under the
> > Special Modules tab in Preferances and just use mouseovers to lookup
> > morphology.
>
>
> Actually, just set Robinson as your Greek Mophology lexicon :)
BTW, front-end developers, please make Robinson's tags AL
I you want to get fancy, you could set Robinson as your Glossary under the
Special Modules tab in Preferances and just use mouseovers to lookup
morphology.
Actually, just set Robinson as your Greek Mophology lexicon :)
___
sword-devel mailing list
[E
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003, David's Mailing List and Spam Receiver wrote:
> On Thursday 09 January 2003 01:10 am, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> > I hope this satisfies everyone. I realize that the KJV2003 project
> > isn't yet complete and it is unfortunate that we must release it in it's
> > unfinished st
On Saturday 11 January 2003 12:12 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> BTW, where in this library (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/) look morphology?
In their standard look up. If you are looking at say euphema (a form of
euphemos) from Phil. 4:8 you will find morphology information on it.
--
Davids Mai
> morpholgy tags in KJV2003? It's a pain when I have to go to the Perseus
> Digital Library to look up morphology for a word.
BTW, where in this library (http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/) look morphology?
--
Victor Porton ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
___
sword-de
On Thursday 09 January 2003 01:10 am, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> I hope this satisfies everyone. I realize that the KJV2003 project
> isn't yet complete and it is unfortunate that we must release it in it's
> unfinished state. My hope is to make frequent updated releases of the
> new KJV module a
On Fri, 10 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> > > Will the KJV2003 encompas hebrew at any point?
> >
> > It already includes Strong's numbers I believe, but it lacks the kind of
> > detail provided in the GNT portion of the KJV2003 (morphology, 1:1 linking
> > between KJV & Hebr
Chris wrote:
> > Will the KJV2003 encompas hebrew at any point?
>
> It already includes Strong's numbers I believe, but it lacks the kind of
> detail provided in the GNT portion of the KJV2003 (morphology, 1:1 linking
> between KJV & Hebrew, etc.).
Do you mean that we already have Hebrew Bible
On Thu, 9 Jan 2003, David's Mailing List and Spam Receiver wrote:
> BDB and Thayer *are* pd works. We just need to find a format that isn't
> derived from olb. Perhaps we can find out where crosswalk.com got theirs from
> that they used to create their lexicons. Also they used other PD works tha
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 01:10, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Ok everyone,
>
> There is an updated version of the SWORD API that deals with the OSIS
> markup in the KJV2003 project. It is only available via cvs at the
> moment, and only the RTF filters support it. My hope is that the
> Biblet
On Thursday 09 January 2003 01:10 am, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Also the Thayer and BDB modules have been removed from our public
> circulation but are still in our module list. If the user requests
> them, they will be directed to the organization claiming copyright on
> them, like all of our ot
Ok everyone,
There is an updated version of the SWORD API that deals with the OSIS
markup in the KJV2003 project. It is only available via cvs at the
moment, and only the RTF filters support it. My hope is that the
Bibletime or Gnomesword guys will have a chance to look at gbfrtf.cpp
and ap
12 matches
Mail list logo
