On 12/04/14 09:48, Daniel Hughes wrote:
Obviously the biggest benefit to most people is 1.7.2 packages being
available. That should be the the first priority.
I've put a newly built set of EXPERIMENTAL Debian packages of 1.7.3 from
trunk at: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/s748z00c3zxiupp/-SdnD2xcH
A lot has happened which should go into a stable release, so your bindings
would nor be the only reason for a point release
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: "Daniel Hughes"
To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
Subject: [sword-devel] Sword pack
Obviously the biggest benefit to most people is 1.7.2 packages being
available. That should be the the first priority.
However once that is done I don't see any harm in development builds
being made available in a PPA for front end developer who want
something newer. It will also result in much be
Daniel, I'm happy to move our flatapi work into a 1.7.3 release, along with any
bug fixes we made along the way. I'm also happy to include your c# bindings.
We've had 2 weeks of opportunity for comments on the interface. Without any
objections over the next few days I'll commit them as is.
On A
On 12/04/14 09:01, Daniel Hughes wrote:
I'm very interested in debian sword packages being made available in a PPA.
However I need packages built from the latest trunk. This is so that I
can make use of features in the flat API that where not present in
1.7.2.
Obviously I could build from trunk,
I'm very interested in debian sword packages being made available in a PPA.
However I need packages built from the latest trunk. This is so that I
can make use of features in the flat API that where not present in
1.7.2.
Having an official development would allow me to publish dev builds of
my ow
Hi there In collaboration with Roberto Sánchez, I've got a working
Debian package for Sword 1.7.2. It needs fully inspecting and testing,
but it's close to being ready. I've put the Debian and the original
tarballs at:
http://ubuntuone.com/4SZ059JHeoS4AlQ4gcr1Uf
http://ubuntuone.com/3gY