At 04:08 PM 7/21/2003 -0700, Chris Little wrote:
Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
It would not bother me at all if Sword instituted a
policy/mechanism that every module had to be in valid well-formed OSIS 1.5,
anything else wouldn't even display.
That certainly works for me. At the moment, we're not
Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
It would not bother me at all if Sword instituted a
policy/mechanism that every module had to be in valid well-formed OSIS 1.5,
anything else wouldn't even display.
That certainly works for me. At the moment, we're not targeting
user-created documents because of the
Chris,
I completely understand you wanting to guard against badly formatted modules
being submitted to the project. I was not "crying for new features." I was
simply reacting against the idea of intentionally obfuscating the module
creation process to keep non-programmers away. I believe the Sword
Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
In other words, the theological content of programmers is much more
important than the theological content of pastors, teachers, theologians, or
seminary professors. If you would rather spend your time studying the Bible
and writing sermons and articles rather than le
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] free Windows compiler for SWORD
> Cost of entry into module making is intentionally high to avoid a huge
> influx of bad modules from people
