Re: [sword-devel] Sword Node.js wrapper

2013-06-16 Thread Chris Burrell
If your app is offline, then I think it counts as any other Sword frontend, in that your'e not redistributing content. This is the case for STEP as I understand it. But you need to distinguish between offline locally and offline while distributing content to others. So if by offline you mean local,

Re: [sword-devel] Sword Node.js wrapper

2013-06-16 Thread Stephan
Hi Chris, thank you for your answer. In terms of Copyright/license, you fall under the "redistribution" category as far as I can tell. As a result, you will need to seek permission for all modules in the repository (apart from those that are public domain). Or at least, that's my understanding.

Re: [sword-devel] Sword Node.js wrapper

2013-06-16 Thread Chris Burrell
Hi Stephan In terms of Copyright/license, you fall under the "redistribution" category as far as I can tell. As a result, you will need to seek permission for all modules in the repository (apart from those that are public domain). Or at least, that's my understanding. Publishing content on the we

Re: [sword-devel] Sword Node.js wrapper

2013-06-16 Thread Stephan
Hi, in my spare time I develop a node.js libsword wrapper as a backend for a future web app. The node.js wrapper will download the requested module and serialize the data, so that a mobile javascript app can handle it. What should I keep in mind to avoid a licence/contribution issue since th

[sword-devel] Sword Node.js wrapper

2013-06-08 Thread Stephan
Hi, I've started to work on a non-blocking nodejs wrapper for libsword. you'll find the sources here: https://github.com/zefanja/sword-addon See app.js for how to use the API (in pre-alpha state...). Regards, Stephan ___ sword-devel mailing list: s