The Strongs(Greek|Hebrew) modules in beta should be essentially the same
as the StrongsReal(Greek|Hebrew). It probably needs an update to the
latest versions of its source docs, and I know it has a number of
encoding problems in the Hebrew module, but I'll do a quick cleanup and
push the update
Aaron Christianson writes:
> If you don't know the Hebrew or Greek alphabets, it is possible that
> the Strong's transliterations will be more helpful to you (though
> those may also be in the 'real' versions, come to think of it).
As StrongsRealGreek's "about" observes:
Technical format rende
The Strong's part of both versions are equally real. As already mentioned,
it's the original languages that are "real" in Strong's real Hebrew and
Strong's real Greek. I am actually a linguist (well, more or less), and the
"Real" versions are easier to use if you know your Hebrew and Greek
alphab
The "Real" versions in the Xiphos repository use real Hebrew and Greek;
the regular modules in the CrossWire repository use transliteration.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Ins
Is one of Strongs or Real Strongs to be preferred or do they both have
advantages or does Real Strongs supersede Strongs?
Unfortunately I am no linguist.
Thanks
Martin
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mail
