I've always compiled it. Never used a distro of the SWORD lib or tools. It is
easy enough to do, especially w/ cmake.
In Him,
DM Smith
On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:55 AM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> Most distro packages will use shared linkage.
>
> --Greg
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:53 AM, DM
That helps, thanks. Teus.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> If you're able to compile yourself than just set --prefix=~/.local or
> -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/.local then when you invoke 'make install' the
> files will be placed appropriately inside of that directory. Best of l
If you're able to compile yourself than just set --prefix=~/.local or
-DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=~/.local then when you invoke 'make install' the
files will be placed appropriately inside of that directory. Best of luck!
--Greg
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Teus Benschop wrote:
> Thanks Greg, for
Thanks Greg, for the information. Based on that information, I will also be
looking into compiling the newest Sword tarball on the targeted Ubuntu
release, then install it the way you describe. That should be giving the
very newest in case the Ubuntu or Debian packages contains older versions.
Teus
You should be able to grab the binary deb from any Ubuntu mirror, unpack
the files, and hand-install them to your user directory. I often will
install programs to the folder $HOME/.local/ on systems I do not have
administrative access to. I then modify my environment to add
$HOME/.local/bin to my p
The shared hosting account runs Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS currently, more
specifically Linux 3.8.0-34-generic #49~precise1-Ubuntu SMP x86_64 x86_64
x86_64 GNU/Linux. If there were a 64 bits package available, that would be
great. The hosting provider is unwilling to install additional packages for
stabil
Most distro packages will use shared linkage.
--Greg
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:53 AM, DM Smith wrote:
> I thought it was statically compiled. At least when I compile on Un*x.
>
> Cent from my fone so theer mite be tipos. ;)
>
> On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Teus Benschop wrote:
>
> David,
>
> So
I thought it was statically compiled. At least when I compile on Un*x.
Cent from my fone so theer mite be tipos. ;)
> On Jan 9, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Teus Benschop wrote:
>
> David,
>
> Sorry, this was my mistake. I am looking for "osis2mod" which is part of the
> Sword library.
>
> Teus.
>
>
Teus,
Which version of Linux are you running? There might be a compatible package
available that would be possible to unpack and install into your user
directory.
--Greg
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Teus Benschop wrote:
> David,
>
> Sorry, this was my mistake. I am looking for "osis2mod" wh
David,
Sorry, this was my mistake. I am looking for "osis2mod" which is part of
the Sword library.
Teus.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 1:51 PM, David Haslam wrote:
> Teus,
>
> There's a mismatch between your subject and body.
>
> Which are you after? usfm2osis or osis2mod ?
>
> The former is now a
Teus,
There's a mismatch between your subject and body.
Which are you after? usfm2osis or osis2mod ?
The former is now a Python script, developed by Chris L.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Statically-compiled-usfm2osis-tp4653342p4653343.html
S
I am looking for a self contained statically compiled 64 bits version of
osis2mod running on Linux.
It is going to be used by Bibledit-Web running on shared hosting account.
That account cannot install system software, and compilers and a linker is
not installed on that account.
I am grateful for
12 matches
Mail list logo
