Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> DM,
> Just a quick note: Chris is suggesting TEI because the OSIS group has
> proposed adopting TEI lexical tags for inclusion into the OSIS spec. I
> suggest either Chris add his work to the existing osis filters making
> SWORD OSIS functionality support the pr
DM,
Just a quick note: Chris is suggesting TEI because the OSIS group has
proposed adopting TEI lexical tags for inclusion into the OSIS spec. I
suggest either Chris add his work to the existing osis filters making
SWORD OSIS functionality support the proposed new tags, or else invoking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> "Jason Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I created the Institutes module, but haven't used it much. Can you point
>> me to a reference where the whitespace problem arises? If I can find it,
>> I'll see what I can do to f
"Jason Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I created the Institutes module, but haven't used it much. Can you point
> me to a reference where the whitespace problem arises? If I can find it,
> I'll see what I can do to fix it.
The problem is that recent Sword lib code (in SVN, post-1.5.9) fail
Karl,
I created the Institutes module, but haven't used it much. Can you point
me to a reference where the whitespace problem arises? If I can find it,
I'll see what I can do to fix it.
Jason
> "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Agreed. There have been many bug fixes. If anyon
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Agreed. There have been many bug fixes. If anyone would like to
> get any other fixes in, please do so very soon.
Among the other things that need to be done, such as DM's lexicon
problems, these need attention:
- Re-issue Finney, Institutes, an
The one change that needs to be done before the NASB is released is the
handling of Strong's numbers of the form G0019!a.
(As to when I'll be done with the NASB Bible and Lexicons: I have about
40hours more work to do on it. So that will be at least a few more
weeks. Then there will be a QA per
I'm Developing python bindings seperately. I'm using Py++ and
boost.pythoninstead of swig
http://pysword.sf.net
Just because it was easier to get an sf account than access to crosswire's
svn.. :)
Blessings
Matthew
On 6/20/07, Bill Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
On 6/19/07, Troy A.
Hello,
On 6/19/07, Troy A. Griffitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agreed. There have been many bug fixes. If anyone would like to get any
other fixes in, please do so very soon.
I'd like to get my Ruby SWIG bindings in if possible.
However, in thinking about SWIG and other bindings, maybe t
Agreed. There have been many bug fixes. If anyone would like to get any
other fixes in, please do so very soon.
-Troy.
Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I should have tested it better before release. My apologies. Thank you
10 matches
Mail list logo