Hi Greg,
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
>
> But the nature of multimap is different - and I'm confused as to how
> it is used at all. What you are showing above I would call a
> multi-dimensional associative array/dictionary. I make them all the
> time in Python and PHP.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> On 11/05/2010 02:41 AM, Greg Hellings wrote:
>> ... would require some effort to be
>> put into the SWIG bindings to provide especially a missing binding for
>> the STL multimap class.
>
> Yeah, in C++ it is nice to be able to access entr
Greetings y'all,
I have added support to the CMake build system in SWORD so that you
can build the Python bindings. If you enable it, then the SWIG
wrapper will be compiled automatically during the normal "make" phase
and all you have to do is chdir into bindings/swig/python and type
"python setu
Troy,
I did some more thinking on it last night. I didn't want to accept the offer
unless I'd thought it over. I think I'd be willing to review patches and
such and watch the list for questions and write documentation. I'm not very
familiar with Sword yet, but I'm about to become familiar on a pr
Andrew,
We would be very interested in any contributions you might have.
Currently, I'm not sure if we have anyone who will admit to owning the
swig bindings. There are a few projects who use them, and we get
contributions now and again, but it would be really nice if someone who
is cu
Thanks, that got me started thinking in the right direction. There's one
detail I neglected to mention: I'm doing this on Mac OS X.
Here's what ended up working for me:
cd bindings/swig/package
vim autogen.sh
Here I edit the file so that cp does not use the -a option, which isn't
valid in the B
Hi,
I had to install libtool and swig before this.
cd bindings/swig/package
./autogen.sh
./configure
make
cd perl
make install
At least that did it for me (after several tries :). The build system looks
kind of broken to me, though.
in swig/examples/ is a short example how the swig bindings cou
I was interested in attempting to build the SWIG bindings for Sword in order
to use the Sword API in conjunction with a Perl project I'm working on.
However, I'm having some trouble figuring out how to build them. They don't
build with the regular ./configure as far as I can tell and
bindings/conf
I was interested in attempting to build the SWIG bindings for Sword in order
to use the Sword API in conjunction with a Perl project I'm working on.
However, I'm having some trouble figuring out how to build them. They don't
build with the regular ./configure as far as I can tell and
bindings/conf
On Monday 06 February 2006 13:46, Jason Turner wrote:
> I am curious who all out there is currently using the SWIG bindings
> for sword, with which languages? I am also wondering what the current
> need/desire is to have the CSharp version working with mono and gcc?
I don't but I could never get t
I will probably work on getting the modifying the bindings/swig
Makefile soon to get the csharp wrappers compiling on unix systems
soon, but I wanted to know how important it was so I could prioritize
my time.
God Bless,
Jason
On 2/6/06, Greg Marine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, and I would lo
Oh, and I would love to see this work with Mono. IMHO, making it compatible with just MS .NET would be my first priority, though. That is because there are 2 great Linux Sword projects. But, if it will work with Mono, that would be great too!
On 2/6/06, Greg Marine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have
I haven't done this yet, but you can build .NET 1.1 and 1.0 with VS2005. The following link has the how-to:http://weblogs.asp.net/rmclaws/archive/2005/06/04/410360.aspx
On 2/6/06, Wade Maxfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
C# is an ECMA language. Mono fully supports that language in version 1.1.
C# is an ECMA language. Mono fully supports that language in version 1.1. The version 2.0 is not there yet, if I remember correctly. (http://www.mono-project.com) The key difference between mono and Microsoft's implementation is that Microsoft supports Windows Forms. Mono does not yet support
Working under mono/gcc would be a good goal for XP (as in cross-platform, not as in WinXP) programs. However, since the goal of Mono (I think) is to be compatible with C# and not vice-versa, if you don't have Mono support you might not be too bad off, since Mono might come around closer to C#/.NET
On 2/6/06, Jason Turner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am curious who all out there is currently using the SWIG bindings
> for sword, with which languages? I am also wondering what the current
> need/desire is to have the CSharp version working with mono and gcc?
I'm using the python swig bindings
I am curious who all out there is currently using the SWIG bindings
for sword, with which languages? I am also wondering what the current
need/desire is to have the CSharp version working with mono and gcc?
God Bless,
Jason
--
http://emptycrate.com Games, Programming, Travel & other stuff
__
Just out of curiosity, how do the make files for the swig bindings get
generated now? All I see in the bindings dir for cvs is a Makefile.am
Makefile.oth and Makefile.swig. How do I go about generating bindings from
this?
___
sword-devel mailing list
[
Ihank you, Daniel!
It works now very well! And the different types for perl, phyton etc. are a
cool idea.
Joachim
On Montag, 7. Oktober 2002 11:32, Daniel Glassey wrote:
> like I said 'just ones that have failed to be installed'. The swig bindings
> require sword 1.5.5 (CVS) and CVS installs th
like I said 'just ones that have failed to be installed'. The swig bindings
require sword 1.5.5 (CVS) and CVS installs this file so it is ok.
Regards,
Daniel
On 5 Oct 2002 at 13:29, Joachim Ansorg sent forth the message:
> On my side zstr.h couldn't be found.
>
> Joachim
>
>
> > afaiu there
On my side zstr.h couldn't be found.
Joachim
> afaiu there are no internal files just ones that have failed to be
> installed
>
> :/ (afaict there are files installed that are only used by winsword)
>
> Daniel
>
> On Saturday 05 Oct 2002 9:03 am, you wrote:
> > Daniel,
> > I like your work on t
afaiu there are no internal files just ones that have failed to be installed
:/ (afaict there are files installed that are only used by winsword)
Daniel
On Saturday 05 Oct 2002 9:03 am, you wrote:
> Daniel,
> I like your work on the Swig configure stuff! I forgot to mention that the
> internal
Daniel,
I like your work on the Swig configure stuff! I forgot to mention that the
internal include files of Sword are required to make the port work, e.g. for
the compression stuff.
To build the modules we havw to add the include path to the sword-cvs/include/
dir.
Joachim
--
Joachim Ansorg
23 matches
Mail list logo
