Matthew Talbert wrote:
> I think there is some confusion here.
>
> The only SWIG bindings that actually work are the Python bindings. The
> others would need some work to even compile. It has been this way for
> some time.
>
> swordweb uses the CORBA bindings, which are unrelated.
You are right
> We have had the occasional bug in SWIG that has been worked around
> (particularly in SWIG's iteration over STL types, which has the
> unpleasant side effect of occasionally causing access violations).
> It's also worth considering the overhead of converting types like
> SWBuf to native Python ty
I think there is some confusion here.
The only SWIG bindings that actually work are the Python bindings. The
others would need some work to even compile. It has been this way for
some time.
swordweb uses the CORBA bindings, which are unrelated.
Matthew
__
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Troy Melhase wrote:
>>> We probably could replace SWIG with SIP, but it is unlikely we would
>>> do it soon just because BPBible works and works now with what is
>>> there. The changes you describe would be far more likely to benefit
>>> t
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:55 PM, Troy Melhase wrote:
>> We probably could replace SWIG with SIP, but it is unlikely we would
>> do it soon just because BPBible works and works now with what is
>> there. The changes you describe would be far more likely to benefit
>> the Python programmer working
> We probably could replace SWIG with SIP, but it is unlikely we would
> do it soon just because BPBible works and works now with what is
> there. The changes you describe would be far more likely to benefit
> the Python programmer working with the SWORD API directly than they
> would be to benefi
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Troy Melhase wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've created a Python binding for libsword via SIP[1]. The code is here:
>
> http://github.com/natural/sword-sip
>
> The binding is mostly complete, certainly the larger classes and
> methods. I'd like it if folks who use t
Greetings,
I've created a Python binding for libsword via SIP[1]. The code is here:
http://github.com/natural/sword-sip
The binding is mostly complete, certainly the larger classes and
methods. I'd like it if folks who use the SWIG bindings could also
try to build this binding with SIP and
