Ulrik Sandborg-Petersen has a GitHub account. https://github.com/emg
I've not looked for one belonging to James Tauber.
Best regards,
David
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] New LXX mod
t;
>
> -------- Original Message
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] New LXX module
> From: Cyrille
> To: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> CC:
>
>
> Progress of the job:
>
> I'm waiting an answer about the lxxm.jar and the convert.sh script.
> I trie
Please do not rely on module export and re-import. This might be useful to see what is going on inside a module, but is lossy and to an extent unpredictable. I would not use any text prepared in this way to upload a new module. Instead, please have a look at James Tauber's and Ulrike Sandborg-Peter
Progress of the job:
I'm waiting an answer about the lxxm.jar and the convert.sh script.
I tried to use mod2osis (I know it's not recommanded), and run again
osis2mod with the good v11n (LXX), after I used the -a option for the
deutero/apocr books. It give a really satisfactory result... Just for
Le 05/01/2018 à 00:34, Peter von Kaehne a écrit :
> So, for text development, I suggest continue to use Gitlab, Github etc
> or simply your private arrangements. Any finalised OSIS etc is stored
> safely on CW's server until superseded.
Do you think it would be possible to create a common reposi
Hello,
Le 04/01/2018 à 15:49, Troy A. Griffitts a écrit :
> We've had a process to create an LXXM module from this source for
> quite some time. It can be created from this script in the sword-tools
> repo:
>
> http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/modules/lxxm/convert.sh
>
Ok I download it
Le 05/01/2018 à 00:34, Peter von Kaehne a écrit :
>
> So, for text development, I suggest continue to use Gitlab, Github etc
> or simply your private arrangements. Any finalised OSIS etc is stored
> safely on CW's server until superseded.
Do you think it would be possible to create a common repo
Hi Matej,
We have an internal store which is not shared other than the current
module team. This is not a repo - we do not do much text development,
but simply the last source text at any given time, so that we can
rapidly reissue a module based on the same text if there are module
making script e
On 2018-01-04, 10:53 GMT, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> Wrt the wider question of keeping source files for
> collaborative work - we do keep source about, since I started
> doing the module uploads, so currently we hold teh source for
> about 80 or so modules.
How can I get access to this shared re
04. Januar 2018 um 10:53 Uhr
>> Von: "Peter Von Kaehne"
>> An: sword-devel@crosswire.org
>> Betreff: Re: [sword-devel] New LXX module
>>
>> Von: Cyrille
>>
>> > Hello,
>> > Currently the LXX module use the default versification not t
Here is the best source I could find
http://ccat.sas.upenn.edu/gopher/text/religion/biblical/lxxmorph/01.Gen.1.mlxx
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 04. Januar 2018 um 10:53 Uhr
> Von: "Peter Von Kaehne"
> An: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> Betreff: Re: [sword-devel] New LXX m
Von: Cyrille
> Hello,
> Currently the LXX module use the default versification not the lxx! :)
> What to do?
I think our LXX module is ancient and derived from an old OLB module at a time
when we neither had alternative versifications nor the convictions we have now
regarding going always back
;> I find the access to Bible sources complex, not open enough. I think
>> there needs to be more flexibility to allow for greater
>> collaboration, is it possible?
>>
>> Happy new year!
>> Br Cyrille
>>>
>>> Sent with ProtonMail <https://protonmail.c
self permission... :) A general
> remark.
> I find the access to Bible sources complex, not open enough. I think
> there needs to be more flexibility to allow for greater collaboration,
> is it possible?
>
> Happy new year!
> Br Cyrille
>>
>> Sent with ProtonMail &
t with ProtonMail <https://protonmail.com> Secure Email.
>
>> Original Message
>> Subject: [sword-devel] New LXX module
>> Local Time: 3 January 2018 9:05 AM
>> UTC Time: 3 January 2018 09:05
>> From: lafricai...@gmail.com
>> To: SWORD Developers&#
On Jan 3, 2018 03:06, "Cyrille" wrote:
Hello,
I noticed that the current LXX module doesn't have all the books, just
the hebrew/protestant canonicals. I am available to create a new module
with these missing books, but I need the current osis file if it is
possible. I download already a doc file
t;modules team" still has a copy of LXX.osis.xml (or whatever
it's called), then things would be simpler.
Best regards,
David
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email.
> Original Message ----
> Subject: [sword-devel] New LXX module
> Local Time:
Hello,
I noticed that the current LXX module doesn't have all the books, just
the hebrew/protestant canonicals. I am available to create a new module
with these missing books, but I need the current osis file if it is
possible. I download already a doc file with all the text of the missing
books, a
18 matches
Mail list logo
