RE: [sword-devel] NASB Copyright

2004-02-04 Thread Dan Adams
- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Uretsky Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 2:50 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [sword-devel] NASB Copyright Excellent! If he does manage to get rights, I'm sure my module would work well, as I produced it from

Re: [sword-devel] NASB Copyright

2004-02-04 Thread Chad Uretsky
. In Christ, Chad - Original Message - From: "Chris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 3:37 PM Subject: Re: [sword-devel] NASB Copyright > Troy is already working with Lockman on the NASB95. > > > Chad U

Re: [sword-devel] NASB Copyright

2004-02-04 Thread Chris Little
Troy is already working with Lockman on the NASB95. Chad Uretsky wrote: I don't know what the task list looks like for the NASB, or what progress (if any) has been made toward obtaining rights from the Lockman Foundation to use the NASB. If anyone would care to get approval for it's use, as a

[sword-devel] NASB Copyright

2004-02-04 Thread Chad Uretsky
I don't know what the task list looks like for the NASB, or what progress (if any) has been made toward obtaining rights from the Lockman Foundation to use the NASB.  If anyone would care to get approval for it's use, as a test (my first attempt at working with Sword modules), I have created