On Nov 29, 2008, at 10:10 AM, jhphx wrote:
> DM Smith wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps a .conf file entry for Repository= entry also.
>>>
>> I'm not sure I understand this. What does this refer and how is it
>> needed.
>>
>
> For modules that are only on alternative repositories it could be
> used to
DM Smith wrote:
Perhaps a .conf file entry for Repository= entry also.
I'm not sure I understand this. What does this refer and how is it
needed.
For modules that are only on alternative repositories it could be used
to generate an indication that the module for some r
On Nov 29, 2008, at 9:54 AM, jhphx wrote:
> Troy wrote:
>> ...I guess the general answer to that is that the
>> .conf file SHOULD have a valid TextSource= entry pointing to where
>> the
>> source was obtained. ...
>
> Perhaps a .conf file entry for Repository= entry also.
I'm not sure I under
Troy wrote:
> ...I guess the general answer to that is that the
> .conf file SHOULD have a valid TextSource= entry pointing to where the
> source was obtained. ...
Perhaps a .conf file entry for Repository= entry also.
Jerry
___
sword-devel mailing
DM Smith wrote:
> On Nov 29, 2008, at 7:30 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>
>> Dear Greg,
>>
>> Yes, we haven't had much that we feel the need to maintain yet, save
>> the
>> token KJV2003 example. This may change in the coming years when our
>> community projects rev up. I understand your con
On Nov 29, 2008, at 7:30 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Dear Greg,
>
> Yes, we haven't had much that we feel the need to maintain yet, save
> the
> token KJV2003 example. This may change in the coming years when our
> community projects rev up. I understand your concern to know where
> the
Dear Greg,
Yes, we haven't had much that we feel the need to maintain yet, save the
token KJV2003 example. This may change in the coming years when our
community projects rev up. I understand your concern to know where the
source documents reside. I guess the general answer to that is that t
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:57 AM, Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Greg Hellings wrote:
>> Just a question...
>>
>> Are both of these accessible to anyone interested? If a confused
>> person can get the source used and the scripts, then run them, they
>> can probably figure that much o
Greg Hellings wrote:
> Just a question...
>
> Are both of these accessible to anyone interested? If a confused
> person can get the source used and the scripts, then run them, they
> can probably figure that much out and have a look at their questions.
> But from the looks of it, the sources ar
Just a question...
Are both of these accessible to anyone interested? If a confused
person can get the source used and the scripts, then run them, they
can probably figure that much out and have a look at their questions.
But from the looks of it, the sources aren't accessible?
--Greg
On Sat, N
CrossWire has an official place to keep content conversion scripts:
http://crosswire.org/svn/sword-tools/trunk/
and places to store the sources used to create the modules which are in
our repository:
crosswire.org:~betamods/source/
crosswire.org:~pubmods/source/
The later has not been kept up
11 matches
Mail list logo
