There is another port - lucene++ - that I've read is the reason CLucene was
abandoned. It targets compatibility with Lucene 3 vs CLucene's targeting of
Lucene 2. It's on github, and its last commit was ~9 months ago. At least
it's better than 2013!
There's also Apache Lucy, which is a "loose C" po
When I contributed to Lucene (Java version) there were folks there who lurked
on the mailing lists that were part of the C port.
Anyway, I mention it as searching those lists or signing up and asking
questions might give appropriate insight.
DM
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 12:25 PM, Greg Hellings wr
On 02/21/2017 03:10 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> The version currently packaged in Fedora is 1.2.24.
Scratch other response -- got confused between mentions of clucene and
xapian. Duh.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.cro
On 02/21/2017 03:10 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> The version currently packaged in Fedora is 1.2.24.
Something is confused.
2.3.3.4 here, along with retro 0.9.21b.
$ egrep '^(|mingw.*)clucene' /var/log/rpmpkgs
clucene09-core-0.9.21b-16.fc24.i686.rpm
clucene09-core-0.9.21b-16.fc24.x86_64.rpm
clucen
If memory serves, that was back in pre-1.0 days. The version currently
packaged in Fedora is 1.2.24.
--Greg
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 2:06 PM, Karl Kleinpaste
wrote:
> On 02/21/2017 02:54 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
> Xapian is the new default at svn head
>
> I experimented with Xapian in Xipho
On 02/21/2017 02:54 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Xapian is the new default at svn head
I experimented with Xapian in Xiphos a couple years ago. The indices it
creates are of horrifyingly monstrous size.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswi
On 02/21/2017 12:25 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> This is going to necessitate dropping the package from the MinGW
> builds of Sword that I maintain for Fedora which will make future
> releases of Xiphos for Windows incapable of offering Lucene based
> searching.
I will keep using "outdated" MinGW pa
Really? I know there had been some conversations around Xapian and a brief
start on a proof of concept, but I was unaware that it had made it into
HEAD or even into living code at all.
--Greg
On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 11:25 -0600, Greg Hell
On Tue, 2017-02-21 at 11:25 -0600, Greg Hellings wrote:
>
> Is there any whiff of hope that we might be willing to move off of
> depending on CLucene for advanced search support and onto a project
> that has any amount of vitality?
>
I thought we had? Xapian is the new default at svn head
Peter
I know it's been mentioned and hinted at in the past, but I wanted to -
again - lodge a complaint regarding the inertia of CLucene use in the
engine.
CLucene's last release, and last git commit on SourceForge was in 2013. It
has had none of the language-specific updates that Lucene has generated
u
10 matches
Mail list logo
