Chris,
We are getting close to getting the KJV2006 out the door. I think we
will release it at the same time as BibleCS.
I know you have been very busy with school and have not had time to
do this. But I thought I'd provide a reminder. I don't think it would
take too much for me to replace
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
I'd bet we haven't tested headings (turning them on and off) and other
things like this in BibleCS.
With regard to headings, I am going to set the "canonical" attribute to
true on the ones from psalms. IMHO, these should not turn off. I've
checked some and I think tha
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
If possible, I think that KJV2006 should be part of the starter kit
for 1.5.8. (This may not happen since I have finished with the NSIS
installer and Troy is eager to create a release.)
I have large reservations about releasing this text with the next
BibleCS installe
If possible, I think that KJV2006 should be part of the starter kit for
1.5.8. (This may not happen since I have finished with the NSIS
installer and Troy is eager to create a release.)
I have large reservations about releasing this text with the next
BibleCS installer (NO NEW FUNCTIONALITY! :
Super! When you get the mapping done, I'll be glad to incorporate it.
(If I were given a file of old=new, one per line, I could add it in
about 1/2 hour.)
While I have a few more things to do before a release, the current state
of the KJV2006, IMHO, is a significant improvement over KJV2003. N
Presuming we aren't looking to put the KJV2006 out the door TODAY or
anything, I will work on a new morphology akin to the Robinson & Packard
morphologies that we can convert using a 1:1 mapping from the OLB codes.
It should be very quick to produce, I just need a little time to get to
it. :) T
DM,
Chris has been about as accurate and specific on the source as I
understand the situation. The Online-Bible (OLB) software guys created
a system that extended their strongs list above the normal range and
added all these new 'strongs numbers' that map to combinations of
morphology. 'OLB
When creating a "proper" OSIS document work ids are to be declared in
the header.
I was trying to figure out one for this and if whether anything was
using it or could use it and whether it could be changed to something
more meaningful.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They are OLB verbal morpholo
They are OLB verbal morphology codes, I believe. I think the "T" stands
for tense, and may be a relic of GBF encoding of this data. We should
probably create a new morphology code system and convert these codes to
that. But for the moment, preserve them at least.
They should map into the old
In the KJV OT I find the following type of morphology.
Does anyone know what this indexes into?
morph="strongMorph:TH8804
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsub
10 matches
Mail list logo
