I was sure I was missing more. Since my recent move, I haven't seen any
of my Hebrew materials.
JEB
>
> On 08-Jul-2003 Jason Brooks wrote:
>> By parsing, I am only dealing with verbs. In Hebrew, and forgive me
>> because I'm a bit rusty, you would designate a verb by its form (?),
>> i.e., Hiphal
On 08-Jul-2003 Jason Brooks wrote:
> By parsing, I am only dealing with verbs. In Hebrew, and forgive me
> because I'm a bit rusty, you would designate a verb by its form (?),
> i.e., Hiphal, Pual, Piel, etc. This is similar to mood in Greek. Then,
> you would designate the person and number
By parsing, I am only dealing with verbs. In Hebrew, and forgive me
because I'm a bit rusty, you would designate a verb by its form (?),
i.e., Hiphal, Pual, Piel, etc. This is similar to mood in Greek. Then,
you would designate the person and number. This would go beyone Strongs
numbering,
Correct, nothing is freely available. The two possibilities that exist
are:
a) working out a deal with someone who already owns a morphologically
tagged text to sell their text in our format--I consider this likely at
some point
b) making our own replacement morphology with something like the
On 08-Jul-2003 Jason Brooks wrote:
> I've been looking around more with the new pres that have been out.
> Is there anything in the works for a parsing tool/module for Hebrew?
> I've had Hebrew in Seminary, but that was definitely not my strong
> suit. If there is nothing freely available
Good Sword Folks,
I've been looking around more with the new pres that have been out.
Is there anything in the works for a parsing tool/module for Hebrew?
I've had Hebrew in Seminary, but that was definitely not my strong
suit. If there is nothing freely available, is there any desire to r
