Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos

2010-10-28 Thread Nic Carter
> > In His Name. > > Johan > > > -Original Message- > From: Johan Marais [mailto:johan.mar...@messianic.co.za] > Sent: 25 October 2010 07:42 PM > To: 'Peter von Kaehne'; sword-devel@crosswire.org > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iP

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos

2010-10-28 Thread Johan Marais
Any suggestions please? In His Name. Johan -Original Message- From: Johan Marais [mailto:johan.mar...@messianic.co.za] Sent: 25 October 2010 07:42 PM To: 'Peter von Kaehne'; sword-devel@crosswire.org Subject: Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos Go

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos

2010-10-25 Thread Johan Marais
Good evening, Once again, thank you for your help. I have copied your suggestion into my text, but when clicking on Isa. 7:14, it takes me to Rev. 1:14 - this is in Xiphos 3.1.3 for Windows. There is no option on the iPhone to select Isa. 7:14. Any suggestions? In His Name, Johan -Ori

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos

2010-10-24 Thread Mark Howard
unsubscribe On 10/24/10, Johan Marais wrote: > > Thank you Peter and Karl, > > I copied the Esther example from the OSIS manual into my text and the > results are as follows: > > Looks correct in Xiphos (Windows), i.e. the text reference (Ezra 4:6) is in > the footnote and I can click on it and i

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-users] From iPhone to Xiphos

2010-10-24 Thread Johan Marais
Thank you Peter and Karl, I copied the Esther example from the OSIS manual into my text and the results are as follows: Looks correct in Xiphos (Windows), i.e. the text reference (Ezra 4:6) is in the footnote and I can click on it and it takes me to the correct text. On my iPhone though, the f

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900

2010-06-11 Thread Teus Benschop
On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 12:14 -0500, Nathan Anderson wrote: > Rapier is in Extra-Testing; and Katana is in Extra-Devel (not sure > why it isn't in testing) -- Both apps are stable and run fine. Thanks, I found and installed both of them. Nice work! Teus

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900

2010-06-10 Thread Nathan Anderson
From: Teus Benschop [mailto:teusjanne...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:18 PM To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum Subject: Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900 On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:43 -0500, Nathan Anderson wrote: > Just a FYI; there is two native N900 apps; R

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900

2010-06-09 Thread Teus Benschop
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:43 -0500, Nathan Anderson wrote: > Just a FYI; there is two native N900 apps; Rapier (Python) and > Katana (C++) using the sword library. They are actually build for the n900 > handling. That is very helpful, thank you. I failed to find any of these applications in

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900

2010-06-09 Thread Nathan Anderson
: sword-devel@crosswire.org Subject: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900 Hi, It was good to see today that GnomeSword, from Debian Lenny, runs well on the Nokia N900 mobile telephone. The N900 runs the Maemo operating system, and the Maemo community has created an application what they call

[sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900

2010-06-09 Thread Teus Benschop
Hi, It was good to see today that GnomeSword, from Debian Lenny, runs well on the Nokia N900 mobile telephone. The N900 runs the Maemo operating system, and the Maemo community has created an application what they call Easy Debian. This allows to install all Debian applications on Maemo, hence Gno

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword is dead. Long live Xiphos.

2009-01-29 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
David Haslam writes: > This has a link to GnomeSword that will eventually require updating or > replacing. There are many links both in Sword and elsewhere that will need to be updated. We'll see about it once we've got the 3.0 release out. Until then, GnomeSword is the name of existing softwar

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword is dead. Long live Xiphos.

2009-01-29 Thread David Haslam
This has a link to GnomeSword that will eventually require updating or replacing. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_SWORD_Project#External_links http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_SWORD_Project#External_links -- David jhphx wrote: > > Karl wrote: >> ... The name chosen by a >> committee of ab

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword is dead. Long live Xiphos.

2009-01-28 Thread jhphx
Karl wrote: ... The name chosen by a committee of about a dozen is Xiphos, ... Nice name. There is a Xiphos.com, Project Xiphos, and a Xiphos font. Jerry ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/list

[sword-devel] GnomeSword is dead. Long live Xiphos.

2009-01-28 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
FYI. As the GnomeSword team has approached its goal of the WIN32 port, the question was raised about its name. Neither "GNOME" nor "Sword" necessarily has a lot of meaning (notwithstanding the project name), even to Linux users, who may not know that their desktop scheme has a name; it was expres

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] CrossWire website up and running

2008-12-12 Thread Peter von Kaehne
David Haslam wrote: > Clicking on http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp > http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp > > just caused > > > HTTP Status 500 - Sorted ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailma

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] CrossWire website up and running

2008-12-12 Thread David Haslam
Clicking on http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp http://crosswire.org/applications.jsp just caused HTTP Status 500 - type Exception report message description The server encountered an internal error () t

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] CrossWire website up and running

2008-12-11 Thread Tonny Kohar
Hi, On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:17 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: >> The software list are still quite long (but much shorter) and the >> screenshots are still there. There are different opinions here regarding >> the suitability of screenshot

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] CrossWire website up and running

2008-12-11 Thread Jonathan Morgan
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > The software list are still quite long (but much shorter) and the > screenshots are still there. There are different opinions here regarding > the suitability of screenshots (i.e Troy thinks they should stay, others > think they should go)

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] videos

2008-12-03 Thread David Haslam
Anyone contemplating making Presentations or Tutorials about Windows [or Linux] programs should take a look at http://www.debugmode.com/wink/ Wink . Wink is a Tutorial and Presentation creation software, primarily aimed at creating tutorials on how to use software (like a tutor for MS-Word/Excel

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] videos

2008-12-01 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 01.12.2008 um 21:30 schrieb Daniel Glassey: > 2008/12/1 Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Matthew Talbert wrote: >> >>> Also, perhaps a demonstration of where all they can get help. The >>> manual, mailing list, irc. >> >> I'm not in a position to tell you what to do,

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] videos

2008-12-01 Thread Martin Gruner
Hi Daniel, are you still the maintainer of the libsword and bibletime packages in Debian? mg On Monday 01 December 2008 21:30:03 Daniel Glassey wrote: > 2008/12/1 Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Matthew Talbert wrote: > >> Also, perhaps a demonstration of where all th

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] videos

2008-12-01 Thread Daniel Glassey
2008/12/1 Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Matthew Talbert wrote: > >> Also, perhaps a demonstration of where all they can get help. The >> manual, mailing list, irc. > > I'm not in a position to tell you what to do, but the topic is > interesting and useful for other softw

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-25 Thread Jason Galyon
Peter von Kaehne wrote: > BTW there are some weird dependencies which have crept into sword etc. > > E.g the diatheke will not install anymore without apache being > installed. While use of the diatheke as CGI is obviously a possibility, > I guess the majority of users simply use it on the commandl

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-25 Thread Jason Galyon
Manfred Bergmann wrote: > Hi. > > I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source > of dominique.corbex. > The GnomeSword package seems to be linked against a gnutls13 library > which is not available there (only gnutls26 which has a higher version > number). > Any ideas

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-25 Thread Jason Galyon
Manfred Bergmann wrote: > Hi. > > I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source > of dominique.corbex. > The GnomeSword package seems to be linked against a gnutls13 library > which is not available there (only gnutls26 which has a higher version > number). > Any ideas

[sword-devel] gnomesword windows right to left

2008-11-22 Thread Matthew Talbert
Here's a shot of gnomesword running right-to-left on windows: http://picasaweb.google.com/ransom1982/Gnomesword#5271522593311044722 There are a few missing translations that I think are misconfiguration rather than Peter overlooking them, so ignore that. Matthew

[sword-devel] Gnomesword Windows Update

2008-11-21 Thread Matthew Talbert
Thanks to Karl's work, it is now possible to compile Gnomesword with the much smaller diff below (against branch 2.4.x). Now abbreviations for modules show up correctly everywhere. Also, it is possible to build with editor support, although activating it currently crashes Gnomesword for me. I beli

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-21 Thread Mike Hart
work. --- On Fri, 11/21/08, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 > To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" > Date: Friday, November 21, 2008,

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-21 Thread Dominique Corbex
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 14:43 +0100, Manfred Bergmann wrote: > All right, thanks. > Are you working on a 8.10 compatible package? > > > Manfred I'm working on a debian unstable compatible package but a backport to 8.10 will be easy. --domcox ___ swor

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-21 Thread Dominique Corbex
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 13:56 +, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > BTW there are some weird dependencies which have crept into sword etc. > > E.g the diatheke will not install anymore without apache being > installed. While use of the diatheke as CGI is obviously a possibility, > I guess the majority of

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-21 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
Peter von Kaehne wrote: > BTW there are some weird dependencies which have crept into sword etc. > > E.g the diatheke will not install anymore without apache being > installed. While use of the diatheke as CGI is obviously a possibility, > I guess the majority of users simply use it on the commandl

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-21 Thread Peter von Kaehne
BTW there are some weird dependencies which have crept into sword etc. E.g the diatheke will not install anymore without apache being installed. While use of the diatheke as CGI is obviously a possibility, I guess the majority of users simply use it on the commandline and apache is a bit of an ove

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-21 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Jonathan Morgan wrote: > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Peter von Kaehne wrote: >>> Matthew Talbert wrote: I do not get this in linux. It looks exactly like the windows screenshot for me. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong? >>> More right th

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-21 Thread Manfred Bergmann
All right, thanks. Are you working on a 8.10 compatible package? Manfred Am 21.11.2008 um 13:33 schrieb Dominique Corbex: > On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 08:32 +0100, Manfred Bergmann wrote: >> Hi. >> >> I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source >> of dominique.corbex. >> Th

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-21 Thread Jonathan Morgan
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 7:25 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter von Kaehne wrote: >> Matthew Talbert wrote: > >>> I do not get this in linux. It looks exactly like the windows >>> screenshot for me. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong? >> >> More right that wrong, given that we h

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-21 Thread Dominique Corbex
On Fri, 2008-11-21 at 08:32 +0100, Manfred Bergmann wrote: > Hi. > > I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source > of dominique.corbex. > The GnomeSword package seems to be linked against a gnutls13 library > which is not available there (only gnutls26 which has a high

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-21 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Hi Tonny, Karl has already answered a good deal, so I keep it short. Tonny Kohar wrote: > Hi Peter > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Peter von Kaehne wrote: >>> I will upload somewhere a Ubuntu screenshot for how it is looking here. >> >> http:/

[sword-devel] GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10

2008-11-20 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Hi. I've tried to install GnomeSword on Ubuntu 8.10 using the apt-source of dominique.corbex. The GnomeSword package seems to be linked against a gnutls13 library which is not available there (only gnutls26 which has a higher version number). Any ideas on how to fix it or do I have to build

[sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows build instructions

2008-11-20 Thread Matthew Talbert
There seems to be a good deal of interest on the sword list, so I'm posting here too. Apologies if it's out of place. These are preliminary instructions. It is quite possible that I have forgotten something important. Please let me know if there are any problems or issues with these. Also, I know

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Tonny Kohar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - Is that the shifting of GUI (the whole things) is the correct > behaviour of RTL locale (I mean the GUI flow/shifting) ? The idea is that the "leading side" of RtoL interfaces is on the right. GTK takes charge of this, based on $LC_ALL for known RtoL l

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Tonny Kohar
Hi Peter On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:25 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter von Kaehne wrote: >> >> I will upload somewhere a Ubuntu screenshot for how it is looking here. > > > http://www.crosswire.org/~refdoc/private/Screenshot-Persian%20Holy%20Bible%20(Tarjumeh-ye%20Ghadeem)%2

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Peter von Kaehne wrote: > Matthew Talbert wrote: >> I do not get this in linux. It looks exactly like the windows >> screenshot for me. Perhaps I'm doing something wrong? > > More right that wrong, given that we had no Gnomesword on windows until > 5 hours ago. But given that plenty of words are

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Matthew Talbert wrote: > On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> How's this? >> Er, spoke too soon. It does show both RtoL text and Farsi digits, but >> it didn't turn the interface around. See, in Linux, wh

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Matthew Talbert
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:10 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How's this? > > Er, spoke too soon. It does show both RtoL text and Farsi digits, but > it didn't turn the interface around. See, in Linux, when you do that, > you get t

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Matthew Talbert
> I used mmap() because it was totally trivial: I just wanted to inhale > the file into a buffer I could chew on. Once I had the file open, one > mmap() gave me its content. > > A replacement stdio solution won't be any challenge, of course. To be > done this evening or tomorrow. Could you also

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Matthew Talbert wrote: >> Not correct unfortunately. >> >> The translated texts (fewer than I remmeber I had done, but that is a >> separate matter) are displayed correctly, but the overall orientation of >> the programme is wrong - everything should re-order itself right to >> left, which was what

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Matthew Talbert
> Not correct unfortunately. > > The translated texts (fewer than I remmeber I had done, but that is a > separate matter) are displayed correctly, but the overall orientation of > the programme is wrong - everything should re-order itself right to > left, which was what stunned us all on Gnomesword

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > "Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> How's this? > > Lovely. Not correct unfortunately. The translated texts (fewer than I remmeber I had done, but that is a separate matter) are displayed correctly, but the overall orientation of the programme is wrong - eve

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How's this? Lovely. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How's this? Er, spoke too soon. It does show both RtoL text and Farsi digits, but it didn't turn the interface around. See, in Linux, when you do that, you get the sidebar on the right and commentary on the left, with main menus on the right as wel

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > "Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> http://picasaweb.google.com/ransom1982/Gnomesword#5270767376254691490 >> It looks like it does in Ubuntu (I think, but the fonts are >> different), except the numbers are on the right in Windows. This works great. Thanks!

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Matthew Talbert
> Now, if you can invoke GnomeSword with the Windows equivalent of > "LC_ALL=fa_IR", so as to see it turn the *entire* interface around to > RtoL, that would be even cooler. Again, I expect it to just work, right > down to Farsi digits in the Bible display and navbar spinners. How's this? http:

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://picasaweb.google.com/ransom1982/Gnomesword#5270767376254691490 > It looks like it does in Ubuntu (I think, but the fonts are > different), except the numbers are on the right in Windows. Oh, yeah, that's right. I (for one) didn't expect other

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Matthew Talbert
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:41 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Could you do me a favour and check out whether Farsi or Arabic modules work? > > One of the problems I found on all Windows platforms was that RtoL > modules were displayed the wrong way round. > > AraSVD and FarsiOPV a

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Could you do me a favour and check out whether Farsi or Arabic modules work? One of the problems I found on all Windows platforms was that RtoL modules were displayed the wrong way round. AraSVD and FarsiOPV are in the repositories. Thansk so much Peter Matthew Talbert wrote: >> I see that yo

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know if speed is the reason mmap is being used or not I used mmap() because it was totally trivial: I just wanted to inhale the file into a buffer I could chew on. Once I had the file open, one mmap() gave me its content. A replacement stdi

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Matthew Talbert
> I see that you have no language divisions known in the module list. > This is because of something you mentioned before, that there is no > mmap() call available. I will re-work the language init code to use > more bland stdio calls to get the language data. Yes, that is correct. I was a little

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I do have a prettier picture now though :) I see that you have no language divisions known in the module list. This is because of something you mentioned before, that there is no mmap() call available. I will re-work the language init code to use mo

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Matthew Talbert
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:08 AM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Brilliant! > > Is there a binary anywhere for download? Not at the moment. I will have to untangle it from my mingw setup first. I do have a prettier picture now though :) http://picasaweb.google.com/ransom1982/Gno

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Brilliant! Is there a binary anywhere for download? Peter Matthew Talbert wrote: > I have successfully compiled Sword and Gnomesword with mingw on Windows. You > can see a screenshot here: > > http://picasaweb.google.com/ransom1982/Gnomesword#5270746858482217858 > > Naturally there is lots of

Re: [sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Matthew Talbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > successfully compiled Sword and Gnomesword with mingw on Windows. Woo-hoo! No doubt there's lots yet to be done. but...WOW. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org

[sword-devel] Gnomesword on Windows

2008-11-20 Thread Matthew Talbert
I have successfully compiled Sword and Gnomesword with mingw on Windows. You can see a screenshot here: http://picasaweb.google.com/ransom1982/Gnomesword#5270746858482217858 Naturally there is lots of work to be done, so volunteers are welcome! Matthew ___

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4.1

2008-11-06 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Maybe for future releases, if Gecko on Solaris still > doesn't work properly, you could add an exception to the autotools for > Solaris so it defaults to gtkhtml on that system? Yes, I probably should have already done that. After all, we default to g

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4.1

2008-11-06 Thread Greg Hellings
Karl On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:24 PM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I released 2.4.1 a little while ago. > > - F1-F4 shortcuts (help, prefs, adv.search, mod.mgr) > - companion modules > - automatic font selection > - fix: mod.mgr lockout problems > - fix: search range infloop in lexd

[sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4.1

2008-11-05 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
I released 2.4.1 a little while ago. - F1-F4 shortcuts (help, prefs, adv.search, mod.mgr) - companion modules - automatic font selection - fix: mod.mgr lockout problems - fix: search range infloop in lexdict & genbook - highlight search terms in adv.search preview - toggle Find to Stop during sear

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

2008-09-26 Thread SonWon
Thanks for the quick reply! I installed this module gnomesword_2.4.0-1_i386.deb and thought incorrectly that Sword was included, After installing libsword6_1.5.11-0hardy1_i386.deb

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

2008-09-26 Thread Gregory Hellings
Sent from my iPhone On Sep 26, 2008, at 19:35, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SonWon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> error while loading shared libraries: libsword-1.5.11.so: cannot open >> shared object file: No such file or directory > > You don't have Sword itself installed firs

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

2008-09-26 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
SonWon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > error while loading shared libraries: libsword-1.5.11.so: cannot open > shared object file: No such file or directory You don't have Sword itself installed first, so you've got a dependency error. ___ sword-devel mai

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

2008-09-26 Thread SonWon
Thank you very much for the answer. I get this error when I try to run, error while loading shared libraries: libsword-1.5.11.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Karl Kleinpaste wrote: SonWon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I installed it, now how do I run it? Ther

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

2008-09-22 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > just has 2.3.6. > Or have I missed something blazingly obvious. At the moment, I'm having trouble getting updates into the project web pages at SourceForge, and I sent that before I had tried (failed) to upload the changes. /mutter/ shell.sourceforge.net is

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

2008-09-22 Thread jonathon
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 20:27, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5528&package_id=104941&release_id=617337 just has 2.3.6. Or have I missed something blazingly obvious. Is this 32 bit or 64 bit? xan jonathon _

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

2008-09-22 Thread Martin Gruner
Congratulations and all the best from the BibleTime team! mg am Sonntag, 21. September 2008 um 20:27 schrieben Sie: > Out the door a few minutes ago. > We now consider GS to be out of "unstable" status. > http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ > ___ > swo

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

2008-09-21 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
SonWon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I installed it, now how do I run it? There is no menu entry in gnome? > I am using Ubuntu 8.04. It installs its gnome desktop entry under Accessories. Otherwise, run it from the command line as "gnomesword2". ___

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

2008-09-21 Thread SonWon
I installed it, now how do I run it? There is no menu entry in gnome? I am using Ubuntu 8.04. Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > Out the door a few minutes ago. > We now consider GS to be out of "unstable" status. > http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ > > ___ >

[sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.4 released

2008-09-21 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
Out the door a few minutes ago. We now consider GS to be out of "unstable" status. http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscrib

[sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.6 released

2008-08-03 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
Out the door yesterday. Intended as the last of our 2.3 development series; 2.4 to follow in a month or so. Per-platform binary builds should begin to appear soon. Our Fedora repo participant, Deji, tends to get to updates within a week or so; domcox will surely have something for Ubuntu very so

[sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.5

2008-07-02 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
FYI, we released 2.3.5 this evening, as an urgent bugfix release to correct a couple unexpected problems from 2.3.4 at the end of last month. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel In

[sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.4

2008-05-26 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
FYI, I put out release 2.3.4 today. Details at: http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above pa

Re: [sword-devel] [GnomeSword-developers] Ubuntu bundling modules

2008-05-11 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > This was brought up just now on sword-support by a user who could not > uninstall the Arabic Bible for which he had little use. > > I think we had discussed this a while ago and the discussion went > inconclusive. Some gthought is was a packaging bug,

[sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.3

2008-01-20 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
FYI, I put out release 2.3.3 today. Details at: http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above pa

[sword-devel] gnomesword verse list

2007-12-28 Thread dmacbanay
Please disregard my last message about the verse list in gnomesword. I didn't have Preview turned on. :( ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your

[sword-devel] gnomesword verse list

2007-12-28 Thread dmacbanay
I've been trying out GnomeSword and would like to suggest adding the capability to double-click on a reference in the verse list and have it display the passage. That would save a lot of time. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http:

[sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.2 has been released

2007-12-26 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
FYI. Download available at: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=5528&package_id=104941&release_id=564185 - module manager improvements - bug fixes in general use of advanced search, in lexdicts and genbooks - image auto-resize is more forgiving - somewhat better use of dialog sp

[sword-devel] Gnomesword announcement on sword web site?

2007-10-22 Thread Brian J. Dumont
Is it possible to get an announcement of the gnomesword 2.3.1 release added to the main sword web page? What could I do to facilitate this? Thanks much, Brian ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/li

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

2007-10-18 Thread Gertjan Francke
Op woensdag 17-10-2007 om 20:36 uur [tijdzone -0700], schreef Troy A. Griffitts: > I agree with everything DM said, but I'm trying to picture any of our > 10s of thousands of windows users pulling up a list of genbooks and > seeing between Calvin's Commentaries and Duke Databank of Papyrii, the

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

2007-10-18 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I honestly tried to find an email from me on sword-devel in Nov '06 to > help me remember my thoughts back then, but couldn't find the one you > mentioned. It wasn't discussed in email; you, DM, and I chatted about it in #sword several times that w

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

2007-10-17 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
I agree with everything DM said, but I'm trying to picture any of our 10s of thousands of windows users pulling up a list of genbooks and seeing between Calvin's Commentaries and Duke Databank of Papyrii, the Gnomesword User's Manual. Do you see where I'm a little concerned that it seems out o

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

2007-10-17 Thread DM Smith
On Oct 17, 2007, at 8:34 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Do you think that the GnomeSword manual should be something that goes in the module repository? When we first discussed such things last November, I asked whether this would be something of

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

2007-10-17 Thread DM Smith
JSword converts the value to a number and if it is non-numeric, defaults it to 1.0. This behavior is based on the documentation on the conf at http://www.crosswire.org/sword/develop/swordmodule I mirrored that documentation at: http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/DevTools:Modules And base

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Little
Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > As for Chris' observation about single-point version numbers, that's > news to me. I don't see why such an arbitrary restriction needs to be > in place, and if it's genuinely policy, then someone had better have a > chat with the folks at bible.org, because their reposit

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

2007-10-17 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Do you think that the GnomeSword manual should be something that goes in > the module repository? When we first discussed such things last November, I asked whether this would be something of general utility; your comment at the time was, "I think

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

2007-10-17 Thread Chris Little
By the way, module version numbers can only have one point (e.g 2.3, not 2.3.1). If you want to keep parity with GS releases, you could use 2.31, assuming no portion of the release number will exceed 9. Troy's point that this should be packaged with GS, not in the module repository certainly ma

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

2007-10-17 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Karl, Do you think that the GnomeSword manual should be something that goes in the module repository? My initial thought is that the repository should contain material based on what it is, not necessarily what storage technology it uses. I would think you might include the manual in your softw

[sword-devel] GnomeSword 2.3.1 (Re: 1.5.10 Released)

2007-10-17 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
GnomeSword 2.3.1 source has been released. Find general info and details at http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/. Binary builders are already busy getting *.rpm and other package formats ready. It would be appreciated if someone with appropriate privileges would pick up the latest GnomeSword manua

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword image support; my repo's image modules (Re: image support)

2007-09-15 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007, Joachim Ansorg wrote: > Karl, > I just updated the Gnomesword manual in the beta area with the version you > supplied. > Please let me know if everything is working as expected. I tested it with the BibleTime svn version. It works as expected (including the pictures). With fa

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword image support; my repo's image modules (Re: image support)

2007-09-14 Thread Joachim Ansorg
Karl, I just updated the Gnomesword manual in the beta area with the version you supplied. Please let me know if everything is working as expected. Somebody else already did the update of bao.conf: Feature=Images Category=Maps It's not listed in the "Generic Books" section in the beta area, thou

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword image support; my repo's image modules (Re: image support)

2007-09-12 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
All I meant was that the updated bao.conf needs to go with BAO currently in beta. Leave it in beta for a little while yet if needed. I'm not trying to push it to live status before the Windows UI understands it. ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-deve

Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword image support; my repo's image modules (Re: image support)

2007-09-12 Thread Chris Little
Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > It would be appreciated if bao.conf could be propagated by someone with > privs to the Crosswire module area. We need to wait on that until the current release of BibleCS has working image support. I would imagine we'll just to a release of BibleCS 1.5.10 when the new

[sword-devel] GnomeSword image support; my repo's image modules (Re: image support)

2007-09-12 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
GnomeSword has just been updated to provide separate module lists for Maps and Images, in both its sidebar and module manager. A pile of *.conf in my repo were updated a little while ago to reflect Feature=Images, plus Category=Images or Category=Maps: maps: images: ABSMaps

[sword-devel] GnomeSword on Windows under cygwin

2007-02-17 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
If you are a Windows user who would like to see a different Sword UI, may I suggest: ftp://ftp.kleinpaste.org/pub/sword/util/cygwin/GnomeSword-under-cygwin.sh Read the comments at the top of the script so as to do the needed manual setup steps, then run the script. You also need to obtain tar fi

  1   2   >