On Tuesday 03 September 2002 03:39 am, Christian Renz wrote:
> Reminder to self: Must spend more time praying and less time talking.
Mind if I steal this for an email tagline?
--
--David's Mailing List and Spam Receiver
Keeping me (relatively) spam free since 2002
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 05:27 am, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David's Mailing List and Spam Reciever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > Anyone looking for that "elsewhere" might want to check out the holy
>
> flame
>
> > > wars at http://fundamentalistforums.c
At 03:39 AM 9/3/2002, Christian Renz wrote:
Okay, this is enough. Discussing
borderline off-topic doctrinal issues
is one thing, but personal attacks do not belong on this list.
Indeed,
not even in our communication repertoire as christians, be it
o(ff|n)li(st|ne). Period.
I have two suggestions:
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 14:17, Danny Freedman wrote:
> the Sword Project is the only one of its
> kind anywhere in the world, even leading software
> bible programs do not have the diversity in Sword...
> Don't spoil it with limitations based on doctrine...we
> have enough limitations as a result of co
- Original Message -
From: "David's Mailing List and Spam Reciever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Anyone looking for that "elsewhere" might want to check out the holy
flame
> > wars at http://fundamentalistforums.com Its a fun place. :)
>
> Is that the fighting fundamentalist forum?
Yes. You k
Thank you for your concern about doctrinal purity. Doctrinal purity is
of highest importance to Christians and to me personally.
The SWORD Project has a purpose statement. I feel this is as much a
*software project* needs.
Though I've enjoyed reading your views and enjoying your zeal, please
Okay, this is enough. Discussing borderline off-topic doctrinal issues
is one thing, but personal attacks do not belong on this list. Indeed,
not even in our communication repertoire as christians, be it
o(ff|n)li(st|ne). Period.
I have two suggestions:
1. We let this thread die a very sudden an
Well said, well spoken!
-Ed
On Monday 02 September 2002 11:17 pm, Danny Freedman wrote:
> Actually, if the Sword Project only included the NTs
> without the respective OTs, I would not be offended...
>
> I do realise that this is a christian project, and I
> realise that there are elements of d
Actually, if the Sword Project only included the NTs
without the respective OTs, I would not be offended...
I do realise that this is a christian project, and I
realise that there are elements of doctrine in the NT.
However, it is not the place of the Sword Project to
dictate how people should u
My My...all those verses
thank goodness for sword and that verse reference list
in the Search window...
BibleCS must be good for something eh?
DF
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on one web page
from News and Sport to Email and M
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002 02:04, Todd Pedlar wrote:
> Christians who do not accept Christ's divinity? If Christ is
> not God, then Christ cannot save.
I agree, but they don't.
The immediate (topical) consideration is whether we want to encourage them to
use something other than the NWT or KIT for the
On Monday 02 September 2002 09:35 pm, Don A. Elbourne Jr. wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Persons who want to continue debating doctrinal statements or casting
> > "fundamentalist Christian" flames about are invited to do so privately,
> > in
> Doctrinal statements serve many purposes, not the least of which is to
> define the acceptable boundaries within a group. Boundaries, by nature, are
> exclusivistic. Having an official doctrinal statement, no matter how broad
> it might be, would imply that "this is what we believe and if you do
ot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 3:36 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Doctrinal Statement
> Having doctrinal statements puts people off, I know, it would put me off
> sword. The fact that I'm Jewish and benefit from sword means a
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Persons who want to continue debating doctrinal statements or casting
> "fundamentalist Christian" flames about are invited to do so privately, in
> the newsgroups, or elsewhere.
Anyone looking for that "elsewhere" might wan
I just
wanted to throw my two cents in the hat. Is your goal to be inclusive or
exclusive? I hope that the goal is to be inclusive. Possibly a
general statement about the Bible being the Creator's revelation to
humankind would be sufficient. By the way, I am a Southern Baptist Pastor in
Ok
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the owner of this list does not wish to discuss such issues, I
> will withdraw my name from the mailing list.
Isn't today some kind of public holiday in the US? Perhaps he's taking a
well-earned rest from working on Sw
In a message dated 9/2/2002 7:57:41 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
you sound as if you're using the phrase "fundamentalist Christian" in a
negative sense. I used to consider myself a fundamentalist Christian because
I do believe in the fundamentals of the Christian faith. T
On Mon, 2 Sep 2002, Pastor Will wrote:
> Just wanted to get some clarification on these points. So, if I'm
> understanding things correctly, the Sword project is a fundamentalist
> Christian project and not an ecumenical effort as I assumed from the
> website statements? Is this indeed the offi
On Monday 02 September 2002 03:21 pm, Pastor Will wrote:
> Just wanted to get some clarification on these points. So, if I'm
> understanding things correctly, the Sword project is a fundamentalist
> Christian project and not an ecumenical effort as I assumed from the
> website statements? Is thi
opers?
The Rev. William Beckwith
Evangelical Lutheran Church in
America
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 5:17
PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Doctrinal
Statement
In a message dated 9/2/2002 4:48:
On Monday 02 September 2002 02:04 pm, Todd Pedlar wrote:
> Whoa.
>
> Christians who do not accept Christ's divinity? If Christ is
> not God, then Christ cannot save. Those who somehow believe
> Christ will save them, but believe that he was only a man are
> unsaved, Fred. We can be accomodatin
In a message dated 9/2/2002 4:48:03 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Having doctrinal statements puts people off, I know, it would put me off
sword. The fact that I'm Jewish and benefit from sword means a lot, and
having doctrinal statements can be offensive to groups, especiall
Having doctrinal statements puts people off, I know, it would put me off
sword. The fact that I'm Jewish and benefit from sword means a lot, and
having doctrinal statements can be offensive to groups, especially those
doing research, and coming from different backgrounds...
If people want to disc
Hi there .
Sorry! I seem to have started an off topic thread. Remind me NEVER to
mention anything about doctrine or denominational bias (or anything other
than techie stuff really). I'd love to discuss these things. BUT NOT
HERE!!!
God bless,
Barry
-- From Barry Drake (The Revd)
min
At 12:41 PM 9/2/2002, fred smith wrote:
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:18:55AM
-0400, Dan Bertles wrote:
> How about including a basic doctrinal statement in the Sword Splash
screen:
> "Believing Jesus always was and is God, born of a virgin
to take away the
> sin of mankind through His blood."
I w
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 10:18:55AM -0400, Dan Bertles wrote:
> How about including a basic doctrinal statement in the Sword Splash screen:
> "Believing Jesus always was and is God, born of a virgin to take away the
> sin of mankind through His blood."
I would certainly have no problem with tha
How about including a basic doctrinal statement in the Sword Splash screen:
"Believing Jesus always was and is God, born of a virgin to take away the
sin of mankind through His blood."
Anyone who can compile sword could remove the splash screen, but the
average person would know the premise o
28 matches
Mail list logo
