Dear all,
My printed Strong's is a facsimile of the original Strong's Exhaustive
Concordance with dictionaries, it being the Thirty First printing, 1973,
of the First Edition, printed 1894, printed by Abingdon Press, Nashville.
My printed Strong's says 2992, not 2994.
2992 is LAOS, which mak
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 08:55:19AM -0400, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Martin Denham writes:
> > The user has suggested another possible OCR error. The error report makes
> > sense but the Sword Strongs module appears to contain the same as other
> > Strongs I have checked on the internet. Here is t
On 9/17/2011 8:55 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
Martin Denham writes:
The user has suggested another possible OCR error. The error report makes
sense but the Sword Strongs module appears to contain the same as other
Strongs I have checked on the internet. Here is the users's report:
3532 Nikol
Chris Little writes:
> I just checked two print editions of Strong's, from different dates &
> publishers. Both have the correct 2992, so I think it's safe to
> correct. It's at least reasonable to assume your print edition is from the
> same publisher as these texts' print source, though.
FWIW,
On 9/17/11 5:55 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
Martin Denham writes:
The user has suggested another possible OCR error. The error report makes
sense but the Sword Strongs module appears to contain the same as other
Strongs I have checked on the internet. Here is the users's report:
3532 Niko
Martin Denham writes:
> The user has suggested another possible OCR error. The error report makes
> sense but the Sword Strongs module appears to contain the same as other
> Strongs I have checked on the internet. Here is the users's report:
> 3532 Nikolaos nik-ol'-ah-os from 3534 and *2994*; v
The user has suggested another possible OCR error. The error report makes
sense but the Sword Strongs module appears to contain the same as other
Strongs I have checked on the internet. Here is the users's report:
03532
3532 Nikolaos nik-ol'-ah-os from 3534 and *2994*; victorious over the
people
Thanks Karl,
I believe the user was using StrongsGreek from the default repo rather than
StrongsRealGreek from the Xiphos repo so I will also raise a bug report for
the StrongsGreek module.
Martin
On 5 September 2011 13:41, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> FYI, StrongsRealGreek in the Xiphos repo has
FYI, StrongsRealGreek in the Xiphos repo has been updated, version
1.4-110905, to reflect this fix (3156, ref 3164 => 3161) as well as a
similar, previously reported glitch in 5043 (ref 5098 => 5088).
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.o
It's an OCR error.
I just checked my real (print) Strong's. The entry for 3156 notes being
a shorter form of *3161* (as suggested), not 3164.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
This question came in via the And Bible help e-mail address but it is too
difficult for me to answer. Can somebody help?
Here is the relevant part of the e-mail:
...I think I've found a mistake within Strong's Greek Dictionary itself,
which - I assume - must be in the original? It is this:
Acts
11 matches
Mail list logo
