Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> 1) Diatheke - we should rebadge the CGI scripts as "examples" or remove
> them due to the security issues associated with them.
This is pretty simple to do, either at package build time or (of course)
it can be done in the original upstream code if Crosswire as a whole
a
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 15:54 +, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> As all of you know the Debian and Ubuntu packages are way out of date,
> and are falling behind more and more. To a degree this is mitigated by
> DomCox's packages, but in the end it hurts the project as it gives
> exposre
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 17:19 +, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> >
> And Dan Glassey has opened up a new mailing list on Debian for
> maintainers.I guess he will post himself more about this.
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-crosswire-devel
> I think thin
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
4) GUI module manager - one of the results of them packaging modules is
that our GUI module managers in BT and GS can not remove packages. A
suggestion raised (and a good one in my view) was that the package
manager could check if privileges for writing are there for a pa
Peter,
full ACK. Thanks for investigating this.
We'll try to release BibleTime 1.7 ASAP.
mg
Am Freitag 23 Januar 2009 16:54:22 schrieb Peter von Kaehne:
> Dear All,
>
> As all of you know the Debian and Ubuntu packages are way out of date,
> and are falling behind more and more. To a degree this
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> A first reponse on #ubuntu-=motu for resolving this on Ubuntu:
>>
>>> refdoc: The short version if you have packages prepared is to file a
>> > bug against the package in Launchpad, attach the .diff.gz of the
>> > package to the bug, tag the bu
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> A first reponse on #ubuntu-=motu for resolving this on Ubuntu:
>
>> refdoc: The short version if you have packages prepared is to file a
> > bug against the package in Launchpad, attach the .diff.gz of the
> > package to the bug, tag the bug upgrade, and subscribe the
>
A first reponse on #ubuntu-=motu for resolving this on Ubuntu:
> refdoc: The short version if you have packages prepared is to file a
> bug against the package in Launchpad, attach the .diff.gz of the
> package to the bug, tag the bug upgrade, and subscribe the
> ubuntu-universe-sponsors team to
Dear All,
As all of you know the Debian and Ubuntu packages are way out of date,
and are falling behind more and more. To a degree this is mitigated by
DomCox's packages, but in the end it hurts the project as it gives
exposre to old stuff.
I have therefore tried to get to the bottom of this and
