Andrew:
Thanks - it was the "PD" that had me puzzled. Reminds me of the story of
a bureaucrat who submitted a document and found "UNO" stamped all over
it at various places. He asked its meaning and was told, "Use No
Abbreviations."
Tom
Tom Sullivan
i...@beforgiven.info
FAX: 815-301-2835
--
Tom, PD is 'public domain'. Public Domain (PD) refers materials that are
not or no longer protected by intellectual property laws such as copyright,
trademark etc.
To confuse, different jurisdictions have different criteria for materials
to enter into the Public Domain. For example see the secti
Peter:
Thanks for your reply. Please excuse my ignorance: What is a "PD
document"? Thanks.
Tom
Tom Sullivan
i...@beforgiven.info
FAX: 815-301-2835
-
Great News!
God created you, owns you and gave you commands to obey.
You have disobeyed God - as your conscience very well
I agree with Peter. The original work and the derivative work are separate
cases.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:42 AM Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 09:54 -0400, Tom Sullivan wrote:
> > First, take Matthew Henry's or Calvin's commentaries. They are way
> > out
> > of copyright to
Peter, there's agreement here. Lets not ruin it ok?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:32 AM Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 15:35 +0200, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> > This matter has been discussed ad nauseam on our mailing list several
> > years ago. Nothing has changed since.
>
> Andre
On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 09:54 -0400, Tom Sullivan wrote:
> First, take Matthew Henry's or Calvin's commentaries. They are way
> out
> of copyright to say the least. Now some publishers may add OCR text,
> comments, footnotes, etc. These are copyrightable. Am I correct in
> thinking that the origin
On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 15:35 +0200, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> This matter has been discussed ad nauseam on our mailing list several
> years ago. Nothing has changed since.
Andrew claims he has not been afforded previous opportunity to discuss
this matter.
I am not sure what level of debate he nee
made of their text. Until then please cease debating the matter here and
please cease offering "test modules" on our list.
*Gesendet:* Montag, 10. September 2018 um 14:15 Uhr
*Von:* "Andrew T."
*An:* "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
*Betreff:* Re:
please cease debating the matter here and please
> cease offering "test modules" on our list.
>
>
>
> *Gesendet:* Montag, 10. September 2018 um 14:15 Uhr
> *Von:* "Andrew T."
> *An:* "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
> *Betreff:* R
here and please cease offering "test modules" on our list.
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2018 um 14:15 Uhr
Von: "Andrew T."
An: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
Betreff: Re: [sword-devel] Dead Sea Scrolls copyright discussion
I welcome h
I welcome honest discussion about it, I thirst for honest discussion about
it, more than I thirst for censorship at least. I have looked into the
copyright status of the DSS. What you say is partially correct. Each
separate manuscript’s translations (as found in Discoveries in Judean
Desert (DJ
Please, be patient and civil in this discussion, appreciating that
copyright and biblical texts are both important and that controversy
abounds when discussing both. Everyone's perspective is welcomed here:
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@cross
Oh! If you have the chance - go see them! Highly recommended!
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:13 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> For those in the Cincinnati area, the Cincinnati Museum will have the Dead
> Sea Scrolls on display starting November 15 with a premiere.
>
> http://www.cincymuseum.org/dead-sea-scr
For those in the Cincinnati area, the Cincinnati Museum will have the Dead Sea
Scrolls on display starting November 15 with a premiere.
http://www.cincymuseum.org/dead-sea-scrolls/premiere
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http:
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> [ This got a bit longer and more philosophical than it started
> out to be. I hope I don't annoy folks too much with it. ]
>
> I wonder if the web forums should merely be shut down. They're really
> of no timely benefit to anyone. Consider: On 21 April, Eeli wrote:
I
That posting didn't request advice on getting the DSS into Sword format,
it requested advice on future licensing and technical issue for texts
and translations that haven't yet been produced.
I checked their site a while back and there's no DSS content there, just
some text about wanting to org
[ This got a bit longer and more philosophical than it started
out to be. I hope I don't annoy folks too much with it. ]
I wonder if the web forums should merely be shut down. They're really
of no timely benefit to anyone. Consider: On 21 April, Eeli wrote:
| Why we don't attract developers
Karl,
December is sadly probably the last time I looked at the user forums.
Our website specifically points publishers and other content people to
email [EMAIL PROTECTED], which we all monitor daily. I would
like for us all to monitor and support users on the public forums, but
traffic
Since last Dec 1, there has been a posting in the Crosswire forums,
Module Requests & Bug Reports, from Peter Kirby, director of the Open
Scrolls Project, asking for advice on getting the DSS into Sword
Project module format, both original language and translations.
When I last exchanged an email
I have been in touch with a related project, making a GPC translation of the
Dead Sea Scrolls. If anyone is interested, they can contact Peter Kirby
(Undergrad in History, AA Fullerton College) Web Site:
http://www.peterkirby.com/ Peter Kirby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
20 matches
Mail list logo
