peter wrote:
> Wrt Win98 we discussed this once DM, I think it is nowadays irrelevant
> for my traget group - everyone is on WinXp and even Vista, apparently
I think we stopped supporting Win9x officially a few years ago, but we
already had all of the support for Arabic that Win9x needed, so a
Ok, I have to apologise here.
Yes I use Wine in Win2000 setting and the display is really all over the
place and not useful - even for the newest BibelCS 1.5.10pre4 which I
installed there a few weeks ago.
But on WinXP where I set up 1.5.10.4 just now on Virtual Box (similar to
Parallels and VM w
On Jan 5, 2008, at 6:43 PM, Chris Little wrote:
>
>
> peter wrote:
>> Having finally had a chance to look at the new version of BibleCS and
>> the FarsiOPV module two problems come to light:
>
> Which version is that, exactly? 1.5.10pre4? (This version number will
> appear as 1.5.10.4 if you chec
peter wrote:
> Having finally had a chance to look at the new version of BibleCS and
> the FarsiOPV module two problems come to light:
Which version is that, exactly? 1.5.10pre4? (This version number will
appear as 1.5.10.4 if you check the file properties in Windows.)
Just to let you know, I'
Having finally had a chance to look at the new version of BibleCS and
the FarsiOPV module two problems come to light:
1) the letters are not ligated ("glyph shaping") This works fine in
Arabic which uses a very similar script - largely same looking letters
but different unicode range.
2) The text
