Re: [sword-devel] BibleCS Installer: SWORD_PATH

2006-02-10 Thread L.Allan-pbio
Interesting I suppose I ought to install JSword and get more familiar with it. You can get it at http://www.crosswire.org/bibledesktop/download.html , use the Windows installer if on Windows. Thanks for the link. It installed nicely and works well. I learned some things. JSword may ha

Re: [sword-devel] BibleCS Installer: SWORD_PATH

2006-02-10 Thread DM Smith
L.Allan-pbio wrote: L.Allan-pbio wrote: (something I'm unclear about does JSword use the C++ api in some manner of "binding", or does it have an independent "reversed engineered" api written in Java?) JSword does not use any C++. It is pure Java. It also does not call any executables,

Re: [sword-devel] BibleCS Installer: SWORD_PATH

2006-02-10 Thread L.Allan-pbio
L.Allan-pbio wrote: (something I'm unclear about does JSword use the C++ api in some manner of "binding", or does it have an independent "reversed engineered" api written in Java?) JSword does not use any C++. It is pure Java. It also does not call any executables, such as InstallManager

Re: [sword-devel] BibleCS Installer: SWORD_PATH

2006-02-10 Thread DM Smith
My thoughts: I think we would want the owners of BibleCS to buy off on these changes to the location of mods.d. Most users don't care to learn about SWORD_PATH. They should not have to. They should not be told about it. Those that do care probably are developers, and they can handle it changing

Re: [sword-devel] BibleCS Installer: SWORD_PATH

2006-02-10 Thread DM Smith
L.Allan-pbio wrote: (something I'm unclear about does JSword use the C++ api in some manner of "binding", or does it have an independent "reversed engineered" api written in Java?) JSword does not use any C++. It is pure Java. It also does not call any executables, such as InstallManag

[sword-devel] BibleCS Installer: SWORD_PATH

2006-02-10 Thread L.Allan-pbio
Regarding SWORD_PATH issues (split from general BibleCS Installer thread to be focused on this issue alone) : DM Smith wrote: I didn't think about overwriting. I'll see about adding a check to see if it is currently defined and pointing to an existing directory. If it is not then I think it sh