Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules question

2013-01-03 Thread Nic Carter
On 04/01/2013, at 12:04 AM, Chris Little wrote: > The only repository not for general public use is not listed in > masterRepoList.conf, and that's the experimental repository. > > The attic repositories are definitely intended for the public to use. If > users care to, they can downgrade fro

Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules question

2013-01-03 Thread Andrew Thule
This site wasn't on my radar, but I find it very useful: http://crosswire.org/wiki/Modules_in_the_beta_repository#Commentary_Modules Many of these (well documented) issues appear easily fixed. For example the 'emptyvss' issues are likely simple problems to fix. It appears the purpose of this pag

Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules question

2013-01-03 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On 03/01/13 13:04, Chris Little wrote: I would suggest that you quit presenting CrossWire Beta as "CrossWire 2". I know Apple doesn't want 'beta' showing up in the delivered app, but I presume you can sidestep this by loading from masterRepoList.conf. I would second that. Beta was meant to be

Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules question

2013-01-03 Thread Chris Little
On 1/3/2013 4:03 AM, Nic Carter wrote: On 03/01/2013, at 6:28 PM, Chris Little wrote: At this point, I wouldn't recommend directing users to download from the beta repository. We don't release new content to beta any longer and the content that was reasonably good has long been moved to oth

Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules question

2013-01-03 Thread Nic Carter
On 03/01/2013, at 6:28 PM, Chris Little wrote: > At this point, I wouldn't recommend directing users to download from the beta > repository. We don't release new content to beta any longer and the content > that was reasonably good has long been moved to other repositories. So the > content r

Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules question

2013-01-02 Thread Chris Little
On 1/1/2013 7:27 PM, Nic Carter wrote: Heya all, Just a quick question about beta modules. Currently we have the wiki page that is meant to be where we "report" problems. I have been emailed again about the Barnes Notes module and looking at the entry for it on the wiki at http://crosswire.o

Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules question

2013-01-02 Thread David Haslam
I see from my facebook feeds that Illya Antonenko (osnova.com) has recently published Barnes as a Kindle edition (& for other e-book platforms too). He generally uses OSIS, so he must have made or edited an OSIS source file for Barnes. Being friendly disposed towards CrossWire, it may be worth as

Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules question

2013-01-02 Thread Peter von Kaehne
On 02/01/13 10:17, David Haslam wrote: Would it not be feasible to correct the *Barnes* commentary module by using mod2imp, edit the output IMP file, and then rebuild using imp2vs ? I have not tried it, but I would think this might massively increase the size of a module with verse ranges as

Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules question

2013-01-02 Thread David Haslam
When beta modules don't get corrected for years, it's probably because other matters have much higher priority, and most CrossWire volunteers have a day-job or other full-time commitments. cf. Those of us who are retired are few and far between. Would it not be feasible to correct the *Barnes* com

[sword-devel] Beta modules question

2013-01-01 Thread Nic Carter
Heya all, Just a quick question about beta modules. Currently we have the wiki page that is meant to be where we "report" problems. I have been emailed again about the Barnes Notes module and looking at the entry for it on the wiki at http://crosswire.org/wiki/Modules_in_the_beta_repository#Co

[sword-devel] Beta modules OSISVersion

2008-06-20 Thread DM Smith
The wiki page on the conf entries (http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/DevTools:Modules) does not mention OSISVersion. When should it be used? Always or is there a default value for it? (e.g. 2.0) In the beta modules I would have expected that every new OSIS module would be require it. It

Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules

2008-06-05 Thread Chris Little
Peter von Kaehne wrote: > I just had a look at the beta module section on the server. There are > many modules now in there for over a year or so. > > What exactly is keeping them back to join the ordinary repositories? Many modules are simply waiting for a version of BibleCS > 1.5.9 to be rel

[sword-devel] Beta modules

2008-06-05 Thread Peter von Kaehne
I just had a look at the beta module section on the server. There are many modules now in there for over a year or so. What exactly is keeping them back to join the ordinary repositories? Can I (or others) do anything in terms of systematic testing to move things forward? Is it a workload proble

Re: [sword-devel] Beta modules

2005-02-08 Thread Chris Little
They're not available at the moment. --Chris DM Smith wrote: Can anyone tell me how to get to the beta modules? The links on the alpha page do not work. ___ sword-devel mailing list sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/swo

[sword-devel] Beta modules

2005-02-08 Thread DM Smith
Can anyone tell me how to get to the beta modules? The links on the alpha page do not work. ___ sword-devel mailing list sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel

[sword-devel] Beta Modules

2002-06-08 Thread Dan Bertles
Can the Beta modules be stored somewhere in zip format? It is much faster to download than using the Install Manager. I only use the IM for telling me when a module has an updated version. Dan