Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Bobby,
> Not sure what CppUnit would give us. I'm sure it has benefits, I
> just don't know what they are. We have a tests directory. I would LOVE
> to be able to standardize them all to exit with an error code if they
> fail, and to write a script that cycles
Bobby,
Not sure what CppUnit would give us. I'm sure it has benefits, I just
don't know what they are. We have a tests directory. I would LOVE to
be able to standardize them all to exit with an error code if they fail,
and to write a script that cycles thru them all and runs them.
Troy,
These small programs would be great candidates for unit tests for each
of these bugs. I've used CppUnit before and could start setting them up
if you'd like. That way, we could begin accumulating a suite of test
cases that could be the basis for future regression test checkpoints.
Che
ok, this should be fixed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Now libSword hangs on the following test:
>
> #include
> #include
>
> void main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> RawLD::createModule("tmp/lextest");
> RawLD lex("tmp/lextest");
>
> lex.SetKey("a");
> lex << "x";
>
>
Now libSword hangs on the following test:
#include
#include
void main(int argc, char **argv)
{
RawLD::createModule("tmp/lextest");
RawLD lex("tmp/lextest");
lex.SetKey("a");
lex << "x";
lex.SetKey("a");
lex.deleteEntry();
lex.S
