So from that we can assume that the module is not public domain?
--GregOn 10/2/05, Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you read through the threads concerning the BDB, you can see thatthis isn't the problem. The problem is copyright.--ChrisSlavo wrote:>>
If BDB module, which was once availa
If you read through the threads concerning the BDB, you can see that
this isn't the problem. The problem is copyright.
--Chris
Slavo wrote:
If BDB module, which was once available through FTP is really Public domain,
why not publish it, even if it is incomplete.
(With warning, that it is in
If BDB module, which was once available through FTP is really Public domain,
why not publish it, even if it is incomplete.
(With warning, that it is incomplete),
I think that explanation of some morphological marks is better then no
explanation at all.
(Who would not like it simply wont instal
Entry 01368 has "br" tag inside "sync" tag, which is of course invalid syntax.
--
Tero Favorin
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: www.favorin.com
Phone: +358-41-4449077
In both the earlier publicly released version of Sword for Windows, and
also the BetaX version, I observed a problem when first starting Sword
and then looking at the BDB module.
It is a dictionary like module, but at first glance there are either 0
or 4 entries by number (similar to Strong's)
On
