Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-12 Thread Dominique Corbex
On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 08:00:58 + Peter von Kaehne wrote: > > This is just to say as no one has voiced any objections to domcox' s French > versifications i will now actively use these if suitable modules are > submitted. Hi! Please find attached the 3 versifications scheme for French Prote

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-12 Thread DM Smith
Of course that is possible. The embedded files are no longer available at the website. I’ve used what was in the email, but I’ll verify once the files are checked into SWORD lib. That is actually quite easy now. In Him, DM > On Mar 12, 2016, at 4:15 AM, David Haslam wrote: > > Please

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-12 Thread DM Smith
Those aren’t canon_*.h files. Those are analysis of them. I went to domcox’s website and couldn’t find them there. In Him, DM > On Mar 12, 2016, at 4:17 AM, David Haslam wrote: > > i.e. In the thre pages linked from here > > https://crosswire.org/wiki/Survey_of_versification_schemes_i

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-12 Thread David Haslam
i.e. In the thre pages linked from here https://crosswire.org/wiki/Survey_of_versification_schemes_in_French_Bibles#Canons_proposals_for_The_Sword_Project David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/1-8-French-versifications-modules-tp4656199p4656213.html Sent

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-12 Thread David Haslam
Please don't assume that the canon.h files attached to an old email are up to date. There were one or two edits done to the files embedded in the wiki pages after DomCox first announced this activity. The wiki pages should have the most up to date content. Best regards, David -- View this me

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread Peter von Kaehne
They will be reissued Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity and typos.On 11 Mar 2016 9:25 pm, yvand wrote: > > What about modules have been already released, such as FreJND? > FreJND needs a proper versification scheme. It would be great to use the > new versification /canon_darbyfr.h/ aft

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread Peter von Kaehne
I think so, yes. Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity and typos.On 12 Mar 2016 2:27 am, DM Smith wrote: > > Found them attached in an earlier email. There are 3 canon files, segond, > darbyfr and calvin. Are we doing all 3? > > I'm working on adding them to JSword. > > In Him, > DM >

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread DM Smith
Found them attached in an earlier email. There are 3 canon files, segond, darbyfr and calvin. Are we doing all 3? I'm working on adding them to JSword. In Him, DM > On Mar 11, 2016, at 8:22 PM, DM Smith wrote: > > Where can I find the canon_*.h files? > > In Him, >DM > >> On Mar 11, 20

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread DM Smith
Where can I find the canon_*.h files? In Him, DM > On Mar 11, 2016, at 3:00 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > > This is just to say as no one has voiced any objections to domcox' s French > versifications i will now actively use these if suitable modules are > submitted. > > These will b

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread yvand
What about modules have been already released, such as FreJND? FreJND needs a proper versification scheme. It would be great to use the new versification /canon_darbyfr.h/ after frontends updates. Le 11/03/2016 09:00, Peter von Kaehne a écrit : > This is just to say as no one has voiced any object

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread Fr Cyrille
Ok this page https://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Survey_of_versification_schemes_in_French_Bibles#Canons_proposals_for_The_Sword_Project doesn’t affect the Catholic french Bible. It's particular of protestant bibles. For the Catholic Bibles the Catholic and Catholic2 versification can be enough. L

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread Fr Cyrille
Ok Merci ! Le 11/03/2016 14:49, Michael H a écrit : https://www.crosswire.org/wiki On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Fr Cyrille > wrote: OK but where can I found the developer's wiki? Le 11/03/2016 12:01, David Haslam a écrit : They are document

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread Michael H
https://www.crosswire.org/wiki On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Fr Cyrille wrote: > OK but where can I found the developer's wiki? > > > Le 11/03/2016 12:01, David Haslam a écrit : > >> They are documented in the developers' wiki. >> >> Follow the Versification category. >> >> David >> >> >> >>

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread Fr Cyrille
OK but where can I found the developer's wiki? Le 11/03/2016 12:01, David Haslam a écrit : They are documented in the developers' wiki. Follow the Versification category. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/1-8-French-versifications-modules-tp465619

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread David Haslam
They are documented in the developers' wiki. Follow the Versification category. David -- View this message in context: http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/1-8-French-versifications-modules-tp4656199p4656202.html Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread Fr Cyrille
Hi Peter, I'm not sure to understand very well what you say, but if you send me a like where to read this french specification (domcox' s??) I can give you my opinion about this type of versification. Major french bible are Catholic, than I can verify all of this... Le 11/03/2016 09:00, Peter

[sword-devel] 1.8, French versifications, modules

2016-03-11 Thread Peter von Kaehne
This is just to say as no one has voiced any objections to domcox' s French versifications i will now actively use these if suitable modules are submitted. These will be marked as requiring version 1.8 which quite clearly is not yet released, but i think is stable enough dossing about in svn.