Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-16 Thread Chris Little
Daniel Glassey wrote: Lynn Allan wrote: Troy wrote: PS. I don't think we can add the VC6 project files to clutter our source directories. If you can get them to follow the same theme as our other project files, then we can consider adding them; however, we're really close to a final release f

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-16 Thread Daniel Glassey
Lynn Allan wrote: > Troy wrote: > >>PS. I don't think we can add the VC6 project files to clutter our >>source directories. If you can get them to follow the same theme as > > our > >>other project files, then we can consider adding them; however, > > we're > >>really close to a final releas

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-16 Thread Lynn Allan
Thanks for the guidance ... I had the impression that attachments were frowned on ... but I guess they are fairly commonplace anymore ... in any case, I also provided a link to the .patch file to be downloaded. I probably could/should have .zipped that >> lcdbible.sf.net/misc/sword_examples-cmdli

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-16 Thread DM Smith
Lynn, I found in submitting patches to JSword that it was better to zip the patch and give it as an attachment as it prevented the wrapping of the patch. When the patch wraps then the person who applies the patch has to join the lines back together properly. For small patches it is not a big de

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-16 Thread Lynn Allan
Troy wrote: > PS. I don't think we can add the VC6 project files to clutter our > source directories. If you can get them to follow the same theme as our > other project files, then we can consider adding them; however, we're > really close to a final release for 1.5.8-- but I would still like th

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-16 Thread Lynn Allan
> Could you please submit a patch for inclusion. It would make my > life much easier than submitting the entire changed file and me having > to diff and manually make the changes. You should be able to run, from > the top level of your tree, a command similar to: > Below are results of svn patch

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-16 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Lynn, Thanks for the added example lines to the usage for the examples and such. Could you please submit a patch for inclusion. It would make my life much easier than submitting the entire changed file and me having to diff and manually make the changes. You should be able to run, from the

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-15 Thread Lynn Allan
> I think examples and tests are less important, but > we can see about adding projects for them also. Your call ... I found the test\*.cpp files to be very helpful to debug-step-around in the sword-api to figure out how it works. Other than biblecs and search.cpp, there isn't sample code to learn

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-14 Thread Chris Little
Lynn Allan wrote: If it would help, I put together a series of vc6 .dsp project files for sword\examples\cmdline and sword\tests. Also, I incorporated some changes in some of the usage messages to hopefully make it a little clearer what the cmdline expects. In addition, there is a vc7.1 project for

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-13 Thread Lynn Allan
From: "Chris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The library and diatheke now build & diatheke runs correctly, using VC++ > 6 and 7.1. Thanks. Much better. If it would help, I put together a series of vc6 .dsp project files for sword\examples\cmdline and sword\tests. Also, I incorporated some changes i

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-12 Thread Chris Little
The library and diatheke now build & diatheke runs correctly, using VC++ 6 and 7.1. --Chris Chris Little wrote: Lynn Allan wrote: Please have a go with it and report what you find! Not sure what you are asking ... lib\vcppmake\vc6 won't build ... seems to be invalid project files? lib\vcppmake\

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-10 Thread Lynn Allan
> /// > SWModule *SWMgr::CreateMod(...) { > ... > if (pos == 1) // pos didn't get defined > /// > > Am I doing something wrong or missing a step? > Actually, it looks like vc7.1 in debug mode detects that pos was never initialized and (somehow or other) causes a run-time e

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-10 Thread Lynn Allan
> I'll take a look at the VC++ projects and make sure they're building today. That would be great. I wrestled with vc7.1 project files and can get diatheke, lookup, and mod2vpl to build. (involves url.cpp, stringmgr.cpp, swobject.cpp, etc.) With svn 1804, however, they all crash within: ///

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-10 Thread Chris Little
Lynn Allan wrote: Please have a go with it and report what you find! Not sure what you are asking ... lib\vcppmake\vc6 won't build ... seems to be invalid project files? lib\vcppmake\vc7.1 won't build ... unresolved compiler errors related to S_IREAD and S_IWRITE I'll take a look at the VC++ proj

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-10 Thread Lynn Allan
> Please have a go with it and report what you find! Not sure what you are asking ... lib\vcppmake\vc6 won't build ... seems to be invalid project files? lib\vcppmake\vc7.1 won't build ... unresolved compiler errors related to S_IREAD and S_IWRITE > http://crosswire.org/sword/ALPHAcckswwlkrfre2

[sword-devel] 1.5.8RC2

2005-05-05 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
We finally have a release candidate 2 available for download! Thanks again for everyone's patience and hard work, including all the great feedback and patch submissions. I think I have everything in and all known issues addressed (that we've agreed to address for this release). Please have a