> When I set the scheme to "navy blue" and restart, I get an access
violation.
> None of the windows contain text, unless I switch from one translation and
> then back. The graphics for the "back" and "search" buttons are missing.
and
> If I try to close the application I get another access violat
> It's OK to have moderation on these forums, as long as the moderation is
> soft (i.e. posts go up to the board immediately and then the moderator
> swoops in to correct grievous errors). I don't see a need to hold up
> everyone's posts just because some people are party poopers.
I agree.
In C
> Yes, but with some caution. These forums can become battle grounds for
> translation wars and other worthless disputes. Tempers get heated and
> people get slandered. You should know what you will do when trouble comes,
> before it comes.
First let me say I like the idea of a forum very much. I
> It wasn't the first module, it was any module, and the problem wasn't in
the
> module with the font setting, it was in modules after that module.
I see what you mean. I will work on this when I get a chance.
> Looks OK - except (sorry) LXXM doesn't work under it - just shows
> garbage text - it was OK under the previous alpha. Sorry to be a bit
> dense but what module(s) do I have to have in order to see the devotional
> of the day? I'd like to try that feature.
Barry...
If you take out the font tag
> Text modules alphabetically after a module in which a font is specified
use
> that font instead of the font specified in preferences. So if AKJV, BHS,
and
> BWE are installed, AKJV uses preferences font, BHS uses Code2000 (from
Font=
> in .conf) and then BWE uses Code2000
I know the cause of th
> The display of Hebrew has altered...
> A different font is used for verses prior to the current verse, and for
the
> rightmost letter of hebrew words in commentaries the first time the
> commentary displays an entry containing Hebrew. Everything else is shown
in
> code2000 (even after removing t
> Is it possible to have the current verse indicated by a different
background
> colour? Currently, red-letter verses don't get their colour changed when
> they are the current verse.
I will look into it. I believe so but I do remember an area in the code
where someone was trying to use a shading
> They are but then fonts and text colors are also. I think you can override
> most of these, not just fonts and text colors. But you need to do it for
> all objects on the form. Check your configuration file and if a setting
> there is not a default then set the color for all the relevant objects
> Everything is now working properly & it looks great. It would be nice
> if changes took effect immediately though.
I totally agree. I need to work on that.
> It did the same for me as it did for Chris - but getting rid of the old
> options.conf and layout.conf seems to have corrected the problem.
> Great work! It gets better every time.
Could you email me the old config files? I need to see what is causing the
crash.
David
> Works as advertised. I didn't see any way to override the default window's
> 3DObjects color settings. Some people may want that. Also, Troy, the
> captions on the buttons is just a little cut off, for lack of room, with
my
> screen settings. When will this move from the alpha page to public
> d
> Hmm, it looks like it could be really cool, but it causes nothing but
> crashing for me. I select a scheme (this even happens for the Default
> scheme now) and restart. The splash screen works fine, but the next
> thing I see (after clicking OK) is an access violation. The background
> color
You need the schemes.conf file if you want to have predefined color schemes.
It is really small so I have attached it if you need it. Just place it into
the same folder as the sword.exe file.
Some things to note about this build are:
1.) The font selection dialog box is the windows standard one s
I have finished the DevotionOfTheDay and Splash
page stuff I talked about earlier this month. I am waiting on the official word
from Troy on what we are going to call BibleCS. OpenSword is the unanimous vote
for a new name but I know Troy was going to post something soon on this, so I am
wa
> But I think I've started a slightly "off topic" discussion on what ought
to
> be a mainly techie list. Can I apologise for that?
I think it is important to discuss/debate these issues as much as it is to
discuss/debate technical issues. We are the modern day scribe and as such
our discussions
> > One point: "We are working on a statement of faith". I find this a bit
> > worrying. In the short time I've been a module developer, I've talked
with
> > folk from all persuasions including a Christadelphian. I don't think we
> > could actually go any further than: "We believe in one God,
OK So OpenBible is out. :(
The runners up appear to be:
OpenSword
WinSword
Bereans
Berean Sword
I may have missed one or two but I tried to pick the ones that have been
suggested and then commented on by others. At this point I vote OpenSword.
Anyothers?
In Christ,
David Trotz
> There is a printed study Bible by that name.
Are you referring to the Open Bible by Nelson publishers? If so it is
spelled as two words. Couldn't we use the OpenBible and be safe?
David
Message> What we need is a name that people are going to understand and that
is catchy. I think BibleCS fails both those tests, especially when it
doesn't currently act as a Bible Contruction Set (I think that was what it
stood for, right).
I agree. BibleCS isn't too catchy, so
> Also how a
Once again I am
pushing the name change for BibleCS. Not so much that it hasto change from
"The Sword Project" Although I do vote for BibleCS, but thatno one is really
talking about this issue and I feel some decision should bemade soon.
Whatever decision is made we have to live with for a l
> MS reports that UTF-16 & UTF-8 were
supported in IE4 on Win95, but> perhaps they failed to translate Unicode
functionality over to their RTF> controls. And NT4 (NT3.1 for that
matter) ought to support Unicode> without a hitch unless it's lacking
font support.
I cannot get either machine
> Jerry makes a good point, however all that needs to be done is change
> those names in the BibleCS program before we launch the website and maybe
> have a glossary so that old users will have a clue. I know that David
Trotz
> has even said that he has a contact that will do a new splash scre
> The CGI is working very nicely now, aside from the localized book names
> bug. You can see it in action at http://bible.gotJesus.org. (Can your
> favorite web Bible do this? --
Chris,
I can't get this link to work. Is it correctly typed or just temporarily
down? I have a friend who may use it
I use NT 4 with IE 5.5 at home and I cannot get the Unicode characters to
show on it either. I can only get them to work when I use NT 4 with IE
6(Beta) which is what I use at work. So I advise that you try to hold off on
the upgrade to IE 5, since it doesn't seem to work either. I have a win95
m
> As Troy mentioned, "BibleCS" is the in-house name. Nobody outside of
> sword-devel who hasn't looked through the source tree knows this as the
> name. Everyone else simply knows it as "The SWORD Project".
I understand, but it would be nice to identify it better. People don't
neccessarily need
> Actually, it was affectionately called BibleCS (as Chris said) inhouse
> because we were going to move to a more 'desktop based, user buildable'
> design like the prototype on the alpha pages. It was intended to be a
> nice drag and drop,
> build-your-desktops,-save-them,-and-trade-with-friends
> It's been a tough 2 weeks, but I feel our development branch is now more
> stable than any of our stable branches have ever been :)
Congratulations :-)
> It looks good. All the bugs I reported are fixed :) But I did find one
> additional bug in the TDavid module. It shows garbage in the NT. In the OT
> it works fine even outside of the Psalms. But if you go to the last
chapter
> of Malachi (3) with the TDavid module showing and change to the nex
> Went to apply your patch and noticed that you changed things in
> CreateTextPane to NOT grab the font from the module's .conf file any
> longer... or changed it to look for "Bible Font" instead of "Font"...
> Was wondering what this was about. Maybe we should use the user defined
> font unless
Looks great. Do you have enough translations? :)
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'SWORD Devel List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 10:37 AM
Subject: [sword-devel] new modules
> I re-posted two OLD modules that were removed a while
I get it now!! :) Thanks for the insight. I was getting so confused. I hope
no one takes my postings as personal. That is one of those things I hate
about email is that you cannot see the other persons body language as we
talk. At least the emoticons are helpfull. 1.7 seemed so far away at first
b
> Yes, we've said that we're planning on splitting the windows frontend
> development from the libs. 1.7.x is the slated restructure branch.
Why the wait? What is the hard part of switching over to the source forge
account? We appear to be at a crossroads here with the pending release of
1.5.2 w
> OK, new sword.exe
>
> I think this one has all the bugs fixed. Please let me know.
It looks good. All the bugs I reported are fixed :) But I did find one
additional bug in the TDavid module. It shows garbage in the NT. In the OT
it works fine even outside of the Psalms. But if you go to the la
> I suggest that -after 1.5.2- the development of the sword lib should
become
> independent from the frontends. Releases should be made more often and not
> depending on release dates of the frontends (BibleCS and BibleTime).
I agree.
> I created a sourceforge account for BibleCS
(http://sf.net/
I don't know if this is of use to anyone, but I find it intriguing. I wish
they would've done this sooner, I would have used it with my ReadingPlanner
program. Oh well. It might be of use to someone here.
In Christ,
David Trotz
> Trolltech Makes Qt/Windows Available Under New Non-Commercial Lice
> sword-rxrtf.exe // first working unicode rtf that had popup menu troubles
Now it has display problems too. NASB shows text but at the end of each line
it shows a random character.
and NIV shows all the text including the rtf code.
> sword-taertf.exe // a new rtf component that I think still ha
Hello all,
I just finished my color schemes task this last weekend. Troy has the patch
and hopefully everyone will reap the benefits soon. One issue I came across
with making a patch was what to do about those .dfm files for forms in
Borland. In release 5.0 of Borland C++ Builder they added the op
> I discovered later this afternoon that removing the module's corresponding
line from the [TextView] section of layout.conf solves
> the problem.
>
> So my ideas now are that installing or updating a module could set the
line in that file to "true", removing a module could remove
> the line from
It looks good on my machine. Both strongs and morp tags work together now.
And the Install Manager downloads locked and unlocked modules fine now. One
bug that I remember someone mentioned is that right-clicking on a verse in
the commentaries doesn't always give the verse list option, it has to be
Sorry I did not make it. I got 95% done on Saturday
night and I was very excited to finish up on Sunday. But when I got home my
computer was making an alarm noise and when I took the cover off the fan had
fallen off the CPU and fried the CPU. I just upgraded my machine Friday and
things were
> OK, new InstallMgr.exe binary available. I switched over to the
> Jedi-Indy project FTP component. It's included in Kylix also and we
> were havin' troubles with the current FTP component anyway. So, tell me
> if ya have any troubles with remote installs, please:
Nice to hear we are trying a
> A question while I'm here -- has anyone ever tried to get sword running
> under WINE on a *nix box? or using the WINE libraries or anything like
> that? I haven't actually had much to do with WINE for about 2 years, and
> so can't quite remember what you can do with WINE, but I was thinking th
> > David,> > My apologies. I probably prematurely
commited the richedit2 stuff.> > I'm not used to other working on the
frontend with me-- but that problem> > is exciting! I'm gonna do
some work on it this even. Thanks again for> > your
persistence. I remember running into this also. I
Ok, Call me stupid but how can I obtain a Chineese font (or other fonts for
unicode modules for that matter) to test these with? Also which modules
should I download to test the unicode with?
Thanks for any help.
David
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Little" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EM
45 matches
Mail list logo
