From: Teus Benschop [mailto:teusjanne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:18 PM
To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] GnomeSword on Nokia N900
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 14:43 -0500, Nathan Anderson wrote:
> Just a FYI; there is two native N900 apps; R
Teus,
Just a FYI; there is two native N900 apps; Rapier (Python) and
Katana (C++) using the sword library. They are actually build for the n900
handling.
Nathan
-Original Message-
From: Teus Benschop [mailto:teusjanne...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 12:40 PM
To:
athan.
-Original Message-
From: Nic Carter [mailto:niccar...@mac.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 25, 2009 10:44 PM
To: SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum
Cc: Nathan Anderson
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] Clucene .09.23 and Sword 1.6.0 / 1.6-svn
-Compiling Help
Hi there Nathan.
--
Multitudes, multitudes,
in the valley of decision!
For the day of the LORD is near
in the valley of decision.
Giôên 3:14 (ESV)
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Nathan Anderson
wrote:
Ben,
Ok, you got my attention totally!
I could not not find any way to compile the S
Ben,
Ok, you got my attention totally!
I could not not find any way to compile the Sword.cxx module generated
by swig in 1.60/1.60svn (I could do it fine in 1.5.11) How exactly did you
get past the VerseManager referencing the inner TreeView PositionListener
class in 1.60?
king with swig bindings for quite some time with this in
the code. I don't believe this inner class should ever be exposed in the
bindings, as it is a mechanism we use in the implementation of a specific
derived class, and not a basic interface.
Are any of the Morgan's around? :)
Matthew,
Thanks for letting me know -- I kinda wondered if that was the case.
I have already deb-ized the .21b for this device to get something going.
When I have some free time; I will come back and work on understanding what
sword needs from Clucene and will attempt to make a #DEFINE abl
The Python bindings are maintained
primarily by the BPBible team, from what I understand, so you can also get
in touch with them for more help on the binding specifically.
--Greg
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Nathan Anderson
wrote:
>
> Is their someone I can/should send a patch to
Is their someone I can/should send a patch to that fixes the python
swig bindings issues in 1.6/1.6svn.Or do I send it to the mailing list?
Nathan
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/lis
vel packages are usually available for most distro, so you
might not want to build clucene yourself, unless you want to try a newer
version than what is available for your distro.
-Troy.
Nathan Anderson wrote:
> I'm new to the mailing list, and I scanned the archives back to dec
>
I'm new to the mailing list, and I scanned the archives back to dec 2008 and
didn't see any solution to this issue. I'm attempting to make the core
components on a linux machine.
I can apparently compile Clucene fine. I can compile ICU fine.
However compiling Sword 1.60 or 1.60-svn I get:
..
11 matches
Mail list logo
