The way I read Matej's original message: he's reporting that the
publisher's of the CzeB21 (or similar) on DBL have suggested Crosswire
publish the Crosswire CzeB21 module to the DBL, because the crosswire
module is an improvement over what's on the DBL. Which implies the original
publisher wants t
I contribute some Bible translations to the DBL. If there are any in there that
were submitted by "eBible.org" with problems, please let me know, specifically,
what the problems are to correct them. I also get Bible translations from the
DBL when they are licensed for free distribution. However,
Maybe I am misunderstanding, but I think Matěj is suggesting that the
publisher of the CzeB21 is telling us that our next module update of the
CzeB21 should come from their text they have uploaded to the DBL.
And Matěj is saying that he thinks their text in the DBL is much worse
than than what we
They have not understood what DBL is good for, which us something entirely different than CrossWire. DBL exists to allow easier sharing between publishing ministries. No "end users" involved. PeterSent from my mobile. Please forgive shortness, typos and weird autocorrects. Original Message
Hi,
what do you think about DBL (https://thedigitalbiblelibrary.org)?
Publishers of CzeB21 felt that our module could be replaced by
their work for DBL (which I don’t think is very good, their
equivalent of CzeBKR is the ancient version of incorrectly
digitised incorrect version).
Are there an
