On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2016-01-14, 12:50 GMT, Baiju M wrote:
>> I know that this project is encouraging new contributors. I can read
>> like this here: http://crosswire.org/volunteers/
>> "Currently, the CrossWire Bible Society has a number of projects in
>> progre
On Fri, 2016-01-15 at 02:35 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2016-01-14, 22:11 GMT, Greg Hellings wrote:
> > I'd be happy to work through gitlab with you (though I would
> > strongly prefer github, where I've made my home)
>
> I don't care about GitHub or GitLab ... I prefer the latter (as
> it is
On 2016-01-14, 22:11 GMT, Greg Hellings wrote:
> I'd be happy to work through gitlab with you (though I would
> strongly prefer github, where I've made my home)
I don't care about GitHub or GitLab ... I prefer the latter (as
it is FLOSS and it kind of grew on me), but no problem with
moving it
Matej,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2016-01-14, 20:12 GMT, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
>> Many projects at CrossWire do have loose to medium submission
>> policies: sword-tools, flashcards, swordweb, parts of
>
> I really have no ax to grind with libsword itself, because I
On 2016-01-14, 20:12 GMT, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Many projects at CrossWire do have loose to medium submission
> policies: sword-tools, flashcards, swordweb, parts of
I really have no ax to grind with libsword itself, because I am
really not a C++ programmer, so I will let somebody else to
Troy,
I do want to say that I appreciate your leadership and dedication to
quality, stability, and robustness of the code. I think your judgment
and leadership in that regard has been excellent. When I was younger
and newer I didn't necessarily understand it all the time, but the
longer I've been
I can take care of imp2ld and tei2mod. The latter needs the same changes. I
need the strongsPad method to be made visible, but I don’t have RW to that part
of the repo.
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 3:21 PM, Костя Маслюк wrote:
>
> The patches attached there are merged upstream
> (https://github.com/
The patches attached there are merged upstream (
https://github.com/greg-hellings/sword/commit/227b71aa5aa3931dc0f8ce998ebc07ea1f55419a)
so bug is fixed on the library side. Counterpart we have some modules in
our repositories that we have to rebuild with latest tools to update *.idx
files. Until t
For those who don't want to go back and read the threads Greg has
posted, and since I am the 'admin' mentioned for trunk of libsword, I'll
make a few brief comments which I hope summarized those emails.
I understand a move to git is likely inevitable.
I like SVN better and I know many people
Having never heard of BosworthToller before, I just googled it.
I found this, which may post-date our text source???
http://www.bosworthtoller.com/
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/AbbottSmith-module-question-tp4655743p4655793.html
Sent from the SW
AFAIK, our module build tools do not even require the existence of the .conf
file let alone the presence of any particular field.
Many a time have I used osis2mod or imp2vs to create a module, and only
afterwards made a .conf file in order to test it in a front-end.
Best regards,
David
--
I'm not aware of having access, but just a note - I had to track it
down online and that title appears to be in the ECCO 2 collection.
--Greg
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:56 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> Does anyone have access to Eighteenth Century Collections Online at a
> university library? They have
Thank you for the corrections. An
update is uploading, now, along with text reconverted from the
source. If you find more opportunities to improve this work,
please let me know. :-)
On 01/13/2016 10:22 PM, ad...@bible.salterrae.net wrote:
Does anyone have access to Eighteenth Century Collections Online at a
university library? They have a PDF scan of the 1769 KJV that would be best for
proofing our KJV.
I can buy print-on-demand copy for about $120. (4 volumes about $30 each). I’d
prefer to buy a PDF.
Thanks,
DM
___
On 01/13/2016 09:01 PM,
ad...@bible.salterrae.net wrote:
I think it would be better to refetch the source texts from
our site and reconvert them, because I may corrected more errors
which I have forgotten.
Thank you. I just got them and reconverted.
Funny that you mentioned MOD-61. I just attached a patch to it that fixes the
bugs that I found. Yes the problem is that strongsPadding is true for all
dictionaries.
The first bug was that any module that has Strong’s Numbers that has keys that
are not padded has to have StrongsPadding=false. S
As far as i remember strongsPadding is true for dictionaries by default, so
your $$$1 is actually $$$1
Good to know sword version for software and for imp2mod used to build
module. Rebuilding module and using latest sword have to fix this issue.
p.s. diggin into http://www.crosswire.org/track
It was reported yesterday by Karl, that BosworthToller has an infinite loop
bug. And that mod2imp hits this bug.
Here is where mod2imp starts to loop:
$$$-ǼWED
-ǽwed. v.
ge-ǽ.
$$$-ǼWIRDLIAN
-ǽwirdlian. v.
ge-ǽ
$$$-ǼÞE
-ǽþe. v.
cyning-ǽ.
$$$1
-ǽþe. v.
cyning-ǽ.
$$$1
-ǽþe. v.
cyning-ǽ.
This la
I added StrongsPadding=false to the conf. Now mod2imp exports as expected.
Module is still in experimental.
BosworthToller still has an infinite loop bug.
In Him,
DM
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 9:40 AM, DM Smith wrote:
>
> I’ve been trawling through the code. Seems that there is support for
Peter,
Gentle reminder...
Please remove CzeNKB and CzeKMS modules from CrossWire Main and drop them
into CrossWire Attic.
Thanks.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Contributing-to-sword-tools-repo-tp4655762p4655783.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mail
Does SWORD support the s grain operator within osisRef ?
From the OSIS 2.1.1 Reference (page 148)
The s grain operator is a string, enclosed by square brackets and preceded
by the "@" sign, all of which
follows, at a mimimum, the main part of an osisRef. For example:
• RSV:Gen.1.1@s[beginning] P
Matej,
Yes, I wasn't meaning to target you directly with my response. My
comments were meant for newcomers to the thread.
--Greg
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2016-01-14, 15:06 GMT, Greg Hellings wrote:
>> Based on the way this conversation has gone in the past, nearly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I totally agree with Matěj and I'm all for the git move, even to the
point of suggesting to create competing Sword++ fork in case of
further objections by Crosswire. I'd be happy to contribute to the C++
code.
God bless!
Jaak Ristioja
On 14.01.2016
On 2016-01-14, 15:06 GMT, Greg Hellings wrote:
> Based on the way this conversation has gone in the past, nearly
> everyone involved except the project administrator would welcome a
> migration to git. Even if it was a self-hosted git. But the project
> admin remained unconvinced the last time the
Based on the way this conversation has gone in the past, nearly
everyone involved except the project administrator would welcome a
migration to git. Even if it was a self-hosted git. But the project
admin remained unconvinced the last time the topic came up.
So please, don't re-open this old sore
On 2016-01-14, 14:20 GMT, David Haslam wrote:
> Free GitHub hostings are all public.
>
> So if you're doing collaborative text development on a copyrighted work,
> assuming you have permissions, you shouldn't be doing on a public GitHub
> project.
>
> If you want any private hostings on GitHub, th
btw. The config item is documented here:
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/DevTools:conf_Files#StrongsPadding
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/AbbottSmith-module-question-tp4655743p4655776.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Just one point that should be remembered.
Free GitHub hostings are all public.
So if you're doing collaborative text development on a copyrighted work,
assuming you have permissions, you shouldn't be doing on a public GitHub
project.
If you want any private hostings on GitHub, there's an annual
I’ve been trawling through the code. Seems that there is support for Strong’s
Numbers that are not padded. If a module contains Strong’s Numbers that are not
padded, it is to use StrongsPadding=false. (Actually any value other than
“true” will be false. TRUE is false.) This module does not have
On 2016-01-14, 12:50 GMT, Baiju M wrote:
> I know that this project is encouraging new contributors. I can read
> like this here: http://crosswire.org/volunteers/
> "Currently, the CrossWire Bible Society has a number of projects in
> progress, all open to new volunteers"
> I think moving to Git wo
Daniel wrote,
"I would also appreciate someone creating a new module. It has been a
long time since I have been able to successfully compile and test a TEI
module. If someone has time and expertise to do this, I would be
grateful because the TEI lexicon module creation cycle is a series of
mysteri
Thanks, Daniel.
Link just added to it here:
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/Non-CrossWire_Text-Development_Projects#Individual_Works
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/AbbottSmith-module-question-tp4655743p4655771.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing
On 2016-01-14, 12:22 GMT, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> You can contribute to the subversion repo by asking Troy to
> add you.
So, there is no code review ... just everybody blindly dumps
their changes to the repo? (more interesting for sword proper
repo).
> I am not sure if there is much mileage
I know that this project is encouraging new contributors. I can read
like this here: http://crosswire.org/volunteers/
"Currently, the CrossWire Bible Society has a number of projects in
progress, all open to new volunteers"
I think moving to Git would be a good choice.
I started collecting few not
You can contribute to the subversion repo by asking Troy to add you.
I am not sure if there is much mileage to move things to anywhere else - what
is in sword-tools are mostly internal tools with very limited applicability -
i.e. some only per module.
But for what it is worth, there is a sword
I’ll be moving JSword’s master to the CrossWire server, but github will
continue to be the public face. We put JSword under github.com/crosswire so
that any other CrossWire projects could be placed there as well.
In Him,
DM
> On Jan 14, 2016, at 7:08 AM, Baiju M wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan
On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> Isn’t it the time to finally switch to git and create repo on
> GitLab/GitHub/somewhereelse?
+1 for the idea to use Git.
It looks like "jsword" project is already maintained in Github:
https://github.com/crosswire
Regards,
Baiju M
__
Thanks for the info. I like your work and think it should be a module. I’ve got
a few higher priorities right now, so it’ll be a few months before I can even
consider it.
DM
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 9:04 PM, Daniel Owens wrote:
>
> DM,
>
> I sent a response but I used the wrong email address. H
On 2016-01-14, 02:04 GMT, Daniel Owens wrote:
> So I suggest a new module needs to be made. I am having
> trouble validating on my Mac, but must have to do with my
> setup. If someone can run xmllint and fix any validation
> problems, I would appreciate that.
I believe it is not yours problem:
On 2016-01-14, 04:30 GMT, Aaron Christianson wrote:
> The BDBGlosses_Strongs module is similar. I started a python wrapper
> on diatheke (I don't know Java or C++, and there is no documentation
> for the SWIG python-sword library) specifically to provide intelligent
There is a nice Python example
How am I supposed to contribute to the sword-tools repo? I use
(as any sensible person would do these days ;)) git, so my repo
is on https://gitlab.com/mcepl/sword-tools/ and all changes are
in fix-av11n_py branch_. How can I propose those so far seven
commits to be merged? Series of emails wit
There is a potential problem were we to widen the scope by adopting
LangSortOrder.
There are some alphabets with letters that have two characters!
Not to mention that there are scripts that use non-alphabet writing systems.
(Syllabaries, Abudiga, Ideogram, etc)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writ
I think I now understand better why John designed this feature.
The example (now in the wiki page) is for Turkmen Latin.
LangSortOrder=AaBbCcÇçDdEeÄ䯿FfGgHhIiJjKkLlMmNnŇňOoÖöPpQqRrSsŞşTtUuÜüVvWwXxYyÝýZzŽž
Observe the strange order in that, with Ä䯿 between Ee and Ff.
Why on earth, might you as
> Hi,
>
> You said you were still working on the files in terms of paragraphs etc.
> Is this done?
Yes, I've done the job that I planed.
>
> Peter
>
> Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity and typos.On 14 Jan 2016 07:01,
> ad...@bible.salterrae.net wrote:
>>
>> On 2016/01/07 12:17, Kahunapule
Thanks Aaron,
I think it would be nice to share the script.
I have friends that are working on Biblical Hebrew projects.
Please start a new thread if you do.
Best regards,
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/better-UTF-sensitive-sort-tp4655731p465575
Hi,
You said you were still working on the files in terms of paragraphs etc. Is
this done?
Peter
Sent from my phone. Apologies for brevity and typos.On 14 Jan 2016 07:01,
ad...@bible.salterrae.net wrote:
>
> On 2016/01/07 12:17, Kahunapule Michael Johnson wrote:
> > It should be converted and
Re: http://ebible.org/epub/jpn1965.mobi
1.Copyright Notice is wrong (or is not accurate).
It says that
"First published in 1963, first copyrigt expired in 1991",
But only the book 'Gospel of John' was published in 1963,
the rest of New testament was published in 1965.
So the expired date of this
47 matches
Mail list logo
