[sword-devel] cmake python bindings

2015-01-08 Thread Ben
Today I've been updating to the latest Sword 1.7 (from the 1-7-x branch). I ran into an issue with the python module not getting installed - here's the cmake command: cmake -DLIBSWORD_LIBRARY_TYPE="Shared" -DLIB_INSTALL_DIR=/usr/local/lib64 -DSWORD_BUILD_TESTS=Yes -DSWORD_BINDINGS=Python -DSWORD_BU

Re: [sword-devel] Scope

2015-01-08 Thread Chris Burrell
I think there's a bit of confusion here. JSword is enhanced to automatically populate a new "side conf file" which sits along side the existing SWORD conf file that the user downloads. The two fields are to record the list of books (OSIS Book abbreviations space separated) and list of verses (OSIS

Re: [sword-devel] Scope

2015-01-08 Thread Jonathan Morgan
Hi DM, Thanks for the comment. I think caching brings us back to the question "Do we expect it to be at chapter level or at book level"? I think there are good arguments for chapter level being theoretically helpful, but it could make a cached conf string much more unwieldy. Which is JSword doing?

Re: [sword-devel] Scope

2015-01-08 Thread DM Smith
It is not fast, but is reasonably fast. It takes a look at the index file (not the data file) to see what verses have size. If size is 0, then that verse is not in the v11n. A book is present if all the verses have size 0. I’m pretty sure that both AndBible and STEP have this woven in. BibleDesk

Re: [sword-devel] Scope

2015-01-08 Thread Jonathan Morgan
Hi Peter, If I read Chris' comment correctly, you wouldn't need to do put anything in the conf file. It will automatically figure it out based on which books (and possibly chapters?) are in the Bible. This roughly matches the direction discussion took in the original thread, as enough people foun

Re: [sword-devel] Scope

2015-01-08 Thread Peter Von Kaehne
Ah brilliant.   So something in Jsword but not yet in Sword?   What is the exact syntax a conf file entry should have? I would try this out immediately.   Peter   Gesendet: Donnerstag, 08. Januar 2015 um 10:58 Uhr Von: "Chris Burrell" An: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" Betreff: 

Re: [sword-devel] Scope

2015-01-08 Thread Chris Burrell
Hi David The discussion did result into code on the JSword project. We now have JSword specific configuration that is populated automatically by examining content (as well as front-end specific configuration). We have a 'scope' and a 'book list' Cheers Chris On 8 January 2015 at 10:51, David H

Re: [sword-devel] Scope

2015-01-08 Thread David Haslam
In another thread from 2008, Chris made an important observation about OSIS Scope. It's also a little ambiguous. How many books are included in the scope Gen-Rev? 66? 73? It's always depended on context. But as we have added av11n since then, this worry may no longer be critical. Regards, Da

Re: [sword-devel] Scope

2015-01-08 Thread David Haslam
The previous thread on this topic had the subject, "Av11n and coverage". It was started by Peter on Jan 5, 2012. There were 38 messages in the thread. The last one was mine on April 26, 2012. In that, I reported something I found in the OSIS reference manual. 7.5.1. Scope The div element has a s