Laurie,
Thank you for sharing the results of your testing. It is thorough and
specific!
Daniel
On 8/29/14 9:05 AM, Laurie Fooks wrote:
Thankyou for the opportunity to raise my questions on inconsistencies
between front ends in sword. I beleive this was the correct forum for
this as a common
Attached summary of findings
On 8/29/14, Laurie Fooks wrote:
> Thankyou for the opportunity to raise my questions on inconsistencies
> between front ends in sword. I beleive this was the correct forum for
> this as a common interpretation of markup is essential for module
> developers. I will att
Thankyou for the opportunity to raise my questions on inconsistencies
between front ends in sword. I beleive this was the correct forum for
this as a common interpretation of markup is essential for module
developers. I will attach a summary table of my findings in a
following post. Please contact
Jon,
My suspicion is that you have a really old version of SWORD on your system
somewhere and this is what is being used. You should uninstall all sword
packages everywhere if you are using an svn checkout.
The list is showing modules compatible with your sword install and if the KJV
module is
Hi Troy
Here's the list I get from the CrossWire repository. KJV is not in that
list.
I've included InstallMgr.conf.
Jon
[General]
PassiveFTP=true
[Sources]
FTPSource=Bible.org|ftp.bible.org|/sword|||20090514005700
FTPSource=CrossWire|ftp.crosswire.org|/pub/sword/raw|||20081216195754
FTPSou
Jon,
Yes, you need to be sure your install of SWORD is working well before
trying the bindings.
make
sudo make install
sudo make install_config
?
And then you had an internet connection when you typed the installmgr
commands, and agreed to the warning about using remote content?
From the
Still no go.
I've completely removed everything, gotten a new copy via SVN and followed
the install instructions included in that distribution.
Everything goes as expected until I get here:
Now let's grab some content:
cd utilities/
sudo ./installmgr -sc
To qualify Karl's response, I think the OSIS genbook support is less solid than
THML.
- Reply message -
From: "Karl Kleinpaste"
To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
Subject: [sword-devel] OSIS markup for gen books and devotionals
Date: Thu, Aug 28, 2014 16:42
On 08/28/2014 11:10
Thanks Karl ... but not many, if any, use more than basic markup?
If I am chasing something which is not achievable, I'll drop it ...
On 29/08/14 01:42, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
On 08/28/2014 11:10 AM, Laurie Fooks wrote:
Is it possible that part of the prob may be that most genbooks have
histor
On 08/28/2014 11:10 AM, Laurie Fooks wrote:
> Is it possible that part of the prob may be that most genbooks have
> historically used "ThML" and some front ends are geared towards that
> markup?
$ cd ~/.sword/mods.d
$ grep -l ^DataPath.*genbook * | xargs grep ^SourceType | tr -d '\r' |
cut -f2 -d=
Resending without attachments as it is queued
Thanks Peter,
I have attached another set of test mods and source with the tags.
The paragraphs display correctly in Xiphos, BPBible and Xulsword but
not in BibleTime or BT-Mini or AndBible.
Really appreciate if you can look at my modules as to whe
Looking at the OSIS manual again, I tried the milestone line break -
and it works, albeit differently on different
front ends e.g. BT displays each break and Xiphos strips extra
linebreaks inserted to give a blank line.
For the BT devels - I have also just found that the images are
displayed in B
12 matches
Mail list logo
