Re: [sword-devel] Sword packaging ....

2014-04-12 Thread ref...@gmx.net
A lot has happened which should go into a stable release, so your bindings would nor be the only reason for a point release Sent from my HTC - Reply message - From: "Daniel Hughes" To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum" Subject: [sword-devel] Sword packaging Date: Sat, Apr 12

Re: [sword-devel] Sword packaging ....

2014-04-12 Thread Daniel Hughes
Obviously the biggest benefit to most people is 1.7.2 packages being available. That should be the the first priority. However once that is done I don't see any harm in development builds being made available in a PPA for front end developer who want something newer. It will also result in much be

Re: [sword-devel] Sword packaging ....

2014-04-12 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Daniel, I'm happy to move our flatapi work into a 1.7.3 release, along with any bug fixes we made along the way. I'm also happy to include your c# bindings. We've had 2 weeks of opportunity for comments on the interface. Without any objections over the next few days I'll commit them as is. On A

Re: [sword-devel] Sword packaging ....

2014-04-12 Thread Barry Drake
On 12/04/14 09:01, Daniel Hughes wrote: I'm very interested in debian sword packages being made available in a PPA. However I need packages built from the latest trunk. This is so that I can make use of features in the flat API that where not present in 1.7.2. Obviously I could build from trunk,

Re: [sword-devel] Sword packaging ....

2014-04-12 Thread Daniel Hughes
I'm very interested in debian sword packages being made available in a PPA. However I need packages built from the latest trunk. This is so that I can make use of features in the flat API that where not present in 1.7.2. Having an official development would allow me to publish dev builds of my ow