A lot has happened which should go into a stable release, so your bindings
would nor be the only reason for a point release
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: "Daniel Hughes"
To: "SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum"
Subject: [sword-devel] Sword packaging
Date: Sat, Apr 12
Obviously the biggest benefit to most people is 1.7.2 packages being
available. That should be the the first priority.
However once that is done I don't see any harm in development builds
being made available in a PPA for front end developer who want
something newer. It will also result in much be
Daniel, I'm happy to move our flatapi work into a 1.7.3 release, along with any
bug fixes we made along the way. I'm also happy to include your c# bindings.
We've had 2 weeks of opportunity for comments on the interface. Without any
objections over the next few days I'll commit them as is.
On A
On 12/04/14 09:01, Daniel Hughes wrote:
I'm very interested in debian sword packages being made available in a PPA.
However I need packages built from the latest trunk. This is so that I
can make use of features in the flat API that where not present in
1.7.2.
Obviously I could build from trunk,
I'm very interested in debian sword packages being made available in a PPA.
However I need packages built from the latest trunk. This is so that I
can make use of features in the flat API that where not present in
1.7.2.
Having an official development would allow me to publish dev builds of
my ow