When Greg compiles the SWORD utilities for Windows, he also makes a separate
suite for 64 bit versions.
Any reason why we shouldn't also have a *Win64* directory under
http://crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/utils/ ?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.co
To coincide with the full release (when it comes) of SWORD 1.7, this section
of our wiki page ought to be updated to include these additional av11ns.
http://crosswire.org/wiki/Alternate_Versification#Supported_versification_systems
I'll gladly provide the editing effort, if Chris can supply an ac
The win32 utilities based on SWORD 1.7.0RC1 (technically r2928, but the
difference has no effect) are at the usual location:
http://crosswire.org/ftpmirror/pub/sword/utils/win32/
One small caveat:
Please refrain from using the Rahlfs, LXX, or Orthodox versification
systems unless you are will
I understand apologies for the unacceptable delay will mean nothing.
SWORD 1.7.0RC1 is available from the following link:
http://crosswire.org/sword/alpha/alpha/sword-1.7.0RC1.tar.gz
Please try your projects with the RC.
(and please update your ChangeLog entries for the official package)
May
I have renamed the module to reflect that it is the text that is called
(by everyone on the internet) the 1871 Elberfelder. If you can identify
the text, we would be happy to update the name to be more accurate (but
not to be more vague, as you propose).
What is hopefully conveyed is that this
Thanks for everyone's input.Attached is a shell script which is modelled after http://crosswire.org/svn/crosswire-java/trunk/src/org/crosswire/sword/web/PackageMod.java.PackageMod.java does the following:Zipping is only done if at least one of the module's files or conf has a more recent modificati
I'm nearly done w/ the cache rebuilding script. This could be a good time to
test it?
In Him,
DM
On Jul 30, 2013, at 1:36 PM, "ref...@gmx.net" wrote:
> Makes no sense to me. Removal is best option
>
> Sent from my HTC
>
> - Reply message -
> From: "David Haslam"
> To:
> Sub
Makes no sense to me. Removal is best option
Sent from my HTC
- Reply message -
From: "David Haslam"
To:
Subject: [sword-devel] German Elberfelder 1871 Bible module isn't
authentic
Date: Tue, Jul 30, 2013 16:05
Suggested interim remedial action:
As the authenticity of *GerElb1
Suggested interim remedial action:
As the authenticity of *GerElb1871* (SwordVersionDate=2003-06-19) is now
unsustainable, please move the existing module from CrossWire Main to
CrossWire Attic.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/German-Elberfelder-
Thanks again, Костя.
On 7/30/2013 5:54 AM, Костя Маслюк wrote:
Chronicles 1,
This was indeed an error.
Psalms 151
Psalm 151 is actually in there, but without verse numbers (so I said it
just contains one verse) or a chapter number. It follows the note about
there being another genuine Psalm
Chronicles 1, Psalms 151 - maybe the only cases. Daniel 3 is also hard case
and i do not know why there are two books for Daniel.
There are commentaries in brackets in attached file.
2013/7/30 Chris Little
> That would be terrific. Thanks, Костя.
>
> One thing to keep in mind is to ignore any
That would be terrific. Thanks, Костя.
One thing to keep in mind is to ignore any numbers in parentheses. These
represent other versification systems (usually the Masoretic
versification), so we don't want to capture that data.
--Chris
On 7/29/2013 4:17 AM, Костя Маслюк wrote:
I would take
12 matches
Mail list logo
