Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread David Haslam
Chris, Why is it so difficult to find? This page came up at the top of a Google search. http://www.editionscle.com/ *Editions Clé *: The joint publications ministry of GBIM and UFM International See http://www.editionscle.com/amenginfo.html UFM International = http://www.ufm.org.uk/ GBIM = G

[sword-devel] swmodule::createModule usage bug (was Re: Using osis2mod crash)

2013-07-16 Thread DM Smith
The problem with osis2mod is that createModule does not like a path that does not already exist. I was thinking that FileMgr should be used to test and create the directory if needed. I saw that there was an FileMgr::isDirectory(path) and that there was a FileMgr::createParent(path). The latter

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-07-16 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Bindings on Ubuntu 13.04 - i386 server install, clean VM apart from needing ldconfig been run and that ICU error message, both Perl and Python bindings seem to work. Peter ___ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.or

Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread Chris Burrell
Hi Can someone point me in the direction of the person who created the FreLSG module? I can't seem to locate "Timnathserah, Inc - Canada & Editions CLE - Villeurbanne - France" anywhere in Canada or in France. I'd like to be able to contact "Timnathserah" to seek permission for STEP. Chris

Re: [sword-devel] Module versions and removals

2013-07-16 Thread DM Smith
We haven't done that in the past. Doubt it is a good idea. In Him, DM On Jul 16, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Chris Burrell wrote: > Hi > > In my long time on the lists, I can't recall seeing a notice for removal of a > module when we thought we had rights and then suddenly we didn't. > > Just wanted

[sword-devel] Module versions and removals

2013-07-16 Thread Chris Burrell
Hi In my long time on the lists, I can't recall seeing a notice for removal of a module when we thought we had rights and then suddenly we didn't. Just wanted to check that sword-devel would be notified of any such instances. Chris ___ sword-devel mail

Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread Chris Little
It wasn't in the repository. At most, you could have found an old zip on the FTP site, unlinked, so you'd have had to have downloaded it directly by browsing the FTP site (or maybe had stale .conf data sitting around that could allow you to see cached zips of removed modules). I've cleared the

Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread David Haslam
Chris, I think you have misunderstood what Chris Little meant by "previous content". That would have been the older module FreLSG that had © Strongs markup. This was removed from our repos. It's an obsoleted module. STEP has no permission to distribute that old module. But the FreSegond modules

Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread Chris Burrell
And it also says Public Domain, which it clearly isn't if the thread is correct. On 16 July 2013 13:43, Chris Burrell wrote: > Can you remove it from the repository please? I took it from there > yesterday? > > Chris > > > > On 16 July 2013 13:17, Chris Little wrote: > >> FreSegond is the curr

Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread Chris Burrell
Can you remove it from the repository please? I took it from there yesterday? Chris On 16 July 2013 13:17, Chris Little wrote: > FreSegond is the current Louis Segond module. There are no errors in the > .conf. > > Permission will not be given to distribute the previous content. STEP does > n

Re: [sword-devel] Using osis2mod crash

2013-07-16 Thread DM Smith
Yes we should test directory existence. In Him, DM On Jul 16, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Marjan Savli wrote: > Hello, > > after few days more I find simple solution for osis2mod crash >(osis2mod.exe sword\modules\texts\ztext\kjva_sloeng\ > kjv_slo_osis_sword.xml -v KJVA -z) > > I needed to cr

Re: [sword-devel] KJVA

2013-07-16 Thread DM Smith
It is a bug in JSword and a fix has been submitted. The description of the KJVA should change to prevent confusion to users. In Him, DM On Jul 16, 2013, at 6:22 AM, Nic Carter wrote: > > Wouldn't this be classified as a bug in JSword? > > However, I do agree that it would be nice to updat

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-07-16 Thread Chris Little
On 7/16/2013 5:19 AM, Greg Hellings wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Mark Trompell mailto:m...@foresightlinux.org>> wrote: I think it's one of these that bite us: """ r2831 | chrislit | 2013-06-23 06:21:14 +0200 (So, 23 Jun 2013) | 2 lines removed ICU stuff from CMake

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-07-16 Thread Greg Hellings
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:14 AM, Mark Trompell wrote: > I think it's one of these that bite us: > """ > r2831 | chrislit | 2013-06-23 06:21:14 +0200 (So, 23 Jun 2013) | 2 lines > > removed ICU stuff from CMake files to match autotools files > > -

Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread Chris Little
FreSegond is the current Louis Segond module. There are no errors in the .conf. Permission will not be given to distribute the previous content. STEP does not have permission to host & distribute it. --Chris On 7/16/2013 1:37 AM, David Haslam wrote: Our policy is to withdraw any module for

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-07-16 Thread Mark Trompell
I think it's one of these that bite us: """ r2831 | chrislit | 2013-06-23 06:21:14 +0200 (So, 23 Jun 2013) | 2 lines removed ICU stuff from CMake files to match autotools files r2830 | chrislit | 2013-06-23 03:22:45 +0200 (S

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-07-16 Thread Chris Little
On 7/16/2013 5:04 AM, Mark Trompell wrote: On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: Von: "Troy A. Griffitts" Does anyone have Ubuntu installed and can try building the swig bindings to confirm or deny they have the same problem as > Peter? This is using autotools. S

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-07-16 Thread Mark Trompell
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote: > > Von: "Troy A. Griffitts" > >> Does anyone have Ubuntu installed and can try building the swig bindings to >> confirm or deny they have the same problem as > Peter? This is using >> autotools. Simply compile and install sword, t

Re: [sword-devel] Using osis2mod crash

2013-07-16 Thread Peter von Kaehne
  Dear Marjan,   The source code for osis2mod is here: http://crosswire.org/svn/sword/trunk/utilities/osis2mod.cpp   Any patches could be sent in via email to this mailing list (sword-devel@crosswire.org)   Yours   Peter Gesendet: Dienstag, 16. Juli 2013 um 12:46 Uhr Von: "Marjan Savli"

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-07-16 Thread Jaak Ristioja
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16.07.2013 06:15, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > OK, wrapping up final things for packaging up 1.7.0. > > Jaak, I've normalized ListKey for you, so you should have your > getCount const and added getElement const and non-const methods. > Other method n

Re: [sword-devel] Using osis2mod crash

2013-07-16 Thread Marjan Savli
Hello, after few days more I find simple solution for osis2mod crash (osis2mod.exe sword\modules\texts\ztext\kjva_sloeng\ kjv_slo_osis_sword.xml -v KJVA -z) I needed to create subdirectiories which I accidentally deleted days ago. So I included in my script these lines. d: chdir d:\ mkd

Re: [sword-devel] KJVA

2013-07-16 Thread Chris Burrell
Yes it is a bug and it's been fixed in a pull request, but I think we should fix the module as well. On 16 July 2013 11:22, Nic Carter wrote: > > Wouldn't this be classified as a bug in JSword? > > However, I do agree that it would be nice to update the description of the > KJVA to indicate the

Re: [sword-devel] KJVA

2013-07-16 Thread Nic Carter
Wouldn't this be classified as a bug in JSword? However, I do agree that it would be nice to update the description of the KJVA to indicate the difference between it and the KJV module, but are there good arguments for the descriptions to be the same? But, again, I'd be tempted to classify thi

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD 1.7.0 final stretch

2013-07-16 Thread Peter von Kaehne
Von: "Troy A. Griffitts" > Does anyone have Ubuntu installed and can try building the swig bindings to > confirm or deny they have the same problem as > Peter?  This is using > autotools.  Simply compile and install sword, then cd to > bindings/swig/package and follow the short> READM

Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread David Haslam
Our policy is to withdraw any module for which there is uncertainty about the copyright status of either the whole text or the added markup. i.e. On the precautionary principle. The proper procedure therefore would be for a request to be sent to Timnathserah, Inc - Canada & Editions CLE - Villeur

Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread David Haslam
Googling for further clues came up with this: http://www.labibleonline.com/telecharger-gratuit.html - La Bible Louis Segond 1910 avec les numéros Strong The download has this further description: Texte du domaine public mais enrichi avec les numéros Strong par *Timnathserah, Inc* au Canada. Ty

Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread Chris Burrell
I guess my main question on this is whether they were removed because of copyright reasons? Chris On 16 July 2013 09:17, David Haslam wrote: > You have posed an interesting question. > > FreSegond Obsoletes=FreLSG > > FreSegond v2.0.1 in CrossWire Av11n repo is later than v1.6 in CrossWire > M

Re: [sword-devel] Strong numbers for Louis Segond

2013-07-16 Thread David Haslam
You have posed an interesting question. FreSegond Obsoletes=FreLSG FreSegond v2.0.1 in CrossWire Av11n repo is later than v1.6 in CrossWire Main. They are made from different sources! v2.0.1 is from VulSearch. v1.6 was from Unbound Bible. History_2.0=added Deuterocanonicals, switched to Vu

Re: [sword-devel] KJVA

2013-07-16 Thread David Haslam
JSword based front-ends not only need to have a different module name and have their own path location, but the descriptions must be unique too! I already discussed this with DM Smith in regard to Bible Desktop. See http://crosswire.org/wiki/DevTools:conf_Files#Uniqueness So - yes - the KJVA Des