Re: [sword-devel] breakage in verse management at -r2785?

I see that your new showchapter.cpp works. The only difference in how that works versus Xiphos code is you changed the VerseKey init slightly, so I made that change: VerseKey *key = (VerseKey *)imodule.getKey(); And yet Xiphos still fails to construct the chapter. The loop never executes once.

Re: [sword-devel] Sword API-151 bug patch

Compiled and tested. This bug is fixed! Gary On 03/11/2013 06:44 AM, Greg Hellings wrote: Bibletime's sword-svn-compat branch has now been updated with the latest changes necessary to build so you should be able to test it now. --Greg On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Gary Holmlund mailto

Re: [sword-devel] breakage in verse management at -r2785?

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > Thanks Karl, > > I just checked in a "showchapter.cpp" example here, which I think > represents your use case: > > http://crosswire.org/svn/**sword/trunk/examples/classes/**showchapter.cpp

Re: [sword-devel] breakage in verse management at -r2785?

Thanks Karl, I just checked in a "showchapter.cpp" example here, which I think represents your use case: http://crosswire.org/svn/sword/trunk/examples/classes/showchapter.cpp It seems to work for me with this execution: ./showchapter jonah.3.1 Could it be the module being used that trips th

Re: [sword-devel] breakage in verse management at -r2785?

Regrets for not following up until this evening; I can send mail here only from home, being firewalled at the office these days. "Troy A. Griffitts" writes: > Do you have an idea of how you are using versekey? > When you display a chapter, are you iterating on the key or on the module? The ess

Re: [sword-devel] Sword API-151 bug patch

Bibletime's sword-svn-compat branch has now been updated with the latest changes necessary to build so you should be able to test it now. --Greg On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Gary Holmlund wrote: > Troy, > > We currently don't have a BibleTime that is compatible with sword svn. I > did try

Re: [sword-devel] Next version

Soon and very soon. I have no more showstoppers on my list. I'd love to hear feedback from frontends about the state of trunk. Apparently something is broken for Xiphos. Any other feedback? Jaak Ristioja wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >Hi! > >What's the timeline for t

[sword-devel] Next version

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi! What's the timeline for the next version of sword? Blessings, Jaak -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iQgcBAEBAgAGBQJRPYtkAAoJEEqsYmEt1rCO8LQ//iQCddG+5FkJQbDD5KUL9qy9 g16HBoAtXIlWEZb3iPdWlYoDKrW7ochfsZVuZivwWmUuMGUR

Re: [sword-devel] breakage in verse management at -r2785?

Karl, I'll have a look. Those changes were fairly major and I was worried I might have broken something. The test suite passes, so I will try to include your use case in the test suite to assure better coverage, once we determine what that is. Do you have an idea of how you are using versekey?